• (nodebb)

    BTW you can modify the code of your generator by taking a string from the user as an input and then use it partially as seed for the RNG. That would make it legit AI following the modern definition ;-)

  • Copro lang (unregistered)

    By agentically getting in the tent with withholding target we are leveraging the poorly hydrated

    Mad Max shit

    By getting in the tent into enabled blue-sky thinking we are rapidly engaging high quality sandwiches

    Actually, our whole business model is just going to a picnic

    Our goal and purpose is saving investor value by powering shareholder-value

    Not sure if a tautology or a Ponzi scheme

  • Thought leader (unregistered)

    We are thought-leaders pressure testing bank accounts

  • Thought leader (unregistered)

    We are thought-leaders pressure testing bank accounts

  • Haf (unregistered)

    We are city-pop albums working future-proof bank accounts

    Thank you for that treat.

  • no (unregistered)

    mine included the phrase "future-proof low hanging fruit", which feels like an oxymoron

  • no (unregistered) in reply to MaxiTB

    if the bullshit then fails to land you a promotion, we can blame it on something along the lines of ""not knowing how to prompt""

  • Vault_Dweller (unregistered)

    A previous boss of mine liked to say "bullshit baffles brains"

  • Pressure Testing (unregistered) in reply to Thought leader

    I volunteer to pressure test my bank account. Fill it up as high as it will go.

  • Mauro (unregistered)

    Hej, the generator is broken, when I click on ”generate” I see just sentences from my company mission document…

  • Rob (unregistered)

    "cradle-to-grave credentialing"??? That's not semantically empty; that's just a description of how authoritarian police states work!

  • Hanzito (unregistered)

    The other tells us what we already know to be true, and makes us feel good. The second kind, of course, is what we'd call "good science".

    Replace "know" by "assume" and you've got a defendable truth. On April, 1, no less.

  • (nodebb) in reply to Vault_Dweller

    I first ran across that as "baloney" instead of "bullshit", although it might be just a lightly-bowdlerised version, but in any event, one I found in the 1959 novel "Next of Kin" by Eric Frank Russell.

  • (nodebb) in reply to Pressure Testing

    I volunteer to pressure test my bank account. Fill it up as high as it will go.

    The thing is, if ot exceeds the pressure limits, it releases everything, leaving you with nothing, so you need to figure when the best time to stop is. Could make for a nice gameshow challenge, assuming the likes of The Price is Right hasn't already used that idea.

  • Joe (unregistered)

    In general, nobody want to believe that the people and institutions they have put their trust in have been lying to and manipulating them. They don't want to admit they have been duped. Everyone is going to take this to mean that people on the other side (not themselves) are the ones being duped, but I have bad news for you, if you don't question the motivations of the messaging coming out of YOUR side, you're being duped. You can't sort out any kind of truth if you don't meet everything you see and hear with at least some skepticism.

  • Chuck McCorvey (unregistered)

    I love this video from George Carlin on the subject of euphemisms which are at the heart of too many of the Corporate Language problem.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dv3ubuJyJDg

  • Chuck McCorvey (unregistered)

    Here's George Carlin's take on euphemisms which are at the heart of many of the Corporate Language problems.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dv3ubuJyJDg

  • (nodebb)

    Brings me back to some Perl code I wrote long ago: http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/LinuxMag/col04.html

  • Fizzlecist (unregistered)

    "We are user-enabling in core competencies" I was in a leadership training course last month (against my will) and the trainer actually said a version of this. Longest two days of my life

  • (nodebb)

    probably my fav so far "By working in new domains with user-enabling we are rapidly working the dating scene"

  • (nodebb) in reply to Joe

    I am VERY skeptical about this entire DWTF article being that it is 4/1. 🙃

    Addendum 2026-04-01 17:15: Linked Cornell story dated 3/2 though so could be legit.

Leave a comment on “Corporate Language Compliance”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #694174:

Log Out

« Return to Article