- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
But… I don't drink coffee… what do I do‽
Admin
Coffee... Breasts... Coffee... Breasts...
Sorry, ladies.
Admin
*looks at mug*
*looks down*
...
*goes for more coffee*
Filed under: i like my breasts as they are thank you very much
Admin
I'm glad to see that the Daily WTF.
Admin
Also oh hey, someone still does right-click blocking in 2015? Yikes, we've figured out how to bypass it back in the days of IE6 at the very least...
Admin
I blame the French supermarket and not the Belgium beer for the first one
Admin
Well, I drink coffee very rarely ...
Admin
Also, when did Seagate change their logo? The old one looked prettier!
Admin
Admin
F12*? I haven't seen anything like this.
I can see how it would be useful to capture right-clicks (say, in a JS-based game), and I don't see how the browser could differentiate between a legit capture and a hijack.
*it's a bit annoying since it doesn't seem Chrome allows you to target and jump to an element from the dev console, but it does its job
Filed under: UNLIKE THE MODS HERE
Admin
Admin
Have Dropbox? Try it there.
I'm kinda in favour of having the browser ask when it detects an event handler hooking into right clicking. Because I would let some sites do it (see above), and was actually thinking of adding right clicking to something I'm working on, but am uneasy about it seeing how flaky it can be.
Now, sure, that can be abused as well (provide legitimate wanted functionality on some elements and then be a jerk when you try right clicking somewhere else), but at least it gives you some control.
Admin
Didn't know Microsoft Lose Weight was out already.
[image]Unless you meant something else?
Admin
When you right-click and select "Inspect Element", you get the DOM tree unrolled to that element. You can't, AFAIK, open the dev console and get some "target an element" option which would achieve the same result without right-clicking.
Admin
Click the top-left search button, that lets you select an element. Works exactly as right click –> inspect element from there.
Admin
Features Features Features Features Mushroom, Mushroom!
...
Sorry.
[size=8]not sorry[/size]
Admin
Oh hey, I missed that somehow. Probably assumed it's some textual search.
Admin
Admin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qkfk7SP2x7E
Admin
IE has a rectangle with a cursor, too!
I think Chrome is doing it wrong.
Admin
So did old Opera. The one that had it working properly first!
So yes, I agree that WebKit is the one who got it wrong. And other browsers do now, too, because they all use WebKit...
Fanboy text in small print. Avoidance suggested.
I should have put this text in the beginning of the post, right?
Admin
Start.
Admin
Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!
Admin
This reminds me of when our local newspaper went through a period of the owners trying to cut costs, during the 2008 recession. Unfortunately cutting actual compositor costs could be a step too far, as the owners discovered when a full page car dealer ad appeared with the dealer name at the top, and a whole page of lorem ipsum except, in the middle, a box with the words "Who's chasing the copy?"
Admin
Ignore the replies above and go for the politically correct feminist solution; learn to accept your breasts as they are and reject the patriarchal male gaze. Of course, if that fails, there's always a boob job.
Admin
Nice. Was that a resume-generating event?
Admin
Admin
FTFY.
Admin
Now we know what Ballmer's really doing after ceasing to be Microsoft's chief chair launcher.
Admin
well, augmentations are definitely out for me, I just don't get the point of them. not in the slightest.
reductions though? those can make a world of positive difference. particularly if you're trying to carry a large cup size on a small frame. that's a great way to get back trouble.
of course most important is feeling confident and secure with your body. if either is going to help and poses no significant, long termmedical downsides then.... well it's your body and your life. (just don't ask me to understand your reasons. Respect them yes, understand them.... not so much.)
Admin
Chrome has built-in protection from that kind of DoS attack.
[image]It's so GUI that a blakeyrat could do it!
Admin
All surgery has potential medical downsides. Doesn't mean that it shouldn't be done, but the risk of complications is always non-zero.
Admin
Of course, if someone wants augmentation, I won't stop them; the most I'll do is say 'It's not necessary' ;)
Admin
a valid point. clarified (hopefully) my opriginal post.
Admin
Well, it was in the UK so it would have been a CV-generating event (just another example of two different languages with some words in common, like "and"). But I have no idea, I just saw the page.
Admin
What about after a mastectomy? Or to correct a noticeable difference in size?
Admin
Same answer ;)
Admin
In those situations, the woman's mental health care practitioner may disagree with you. In the second scenario, it may lead to back problems, so it may even be necessary for her physical well being.
Admin
And they would be right to follow the advice of a medical professional over some random hedgy :P