- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
-
Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
This is why it's so absurd to me that Fox Entertainment Group, Inc is trying to obtain the rights to own and manage the .fox TLD.
Admin
There's nothing wrong with that. They're <clearly> a group that makes entertainment for foxes, why shouldn't they have
.fox?Of course it's a bit speciesist to assume that entertainment intended for foxes wouldn't necessarily be interesting to viewers from related species.
Admin
No, Fox Entertainment Group is the one that owns Faux News.
Admin
Didn't you hear that whooshing when it went over your head?
Admin
I caught it, but I couldn't pass up the opportunity to differentiate Faux News from foxes.
Admin
That's what <!--comments in the raw are for-->
Admin
Sorry, I'm new here. I'm still getting used to the idea of having more than just plain text and BBCode allowed in forum posts <!-- "But how will we have XSS awards if you're not allowed to use anything that could be an XSS vulnerability?" -Discologic -->