• (disco) in reply to dcon
    dcon:
    abarker:
    VS is the Microsoft IDE for the .NET Framework.

    Brought to you by a win32 C++ user

    People like you are the reason that @PleegWat called VS an abomination. :passport_control:

  • (disco) in reply to abarker
    abarker:
    People like you are the reason that @PleegWat called VS an abomination.

    I do use the one-true-editor.

    <vim ui="gvim"/>
  • (disco) in reply to dcon

    Aurora?

  • (disco)

    The article is not too bad...dramatized...but actually catches the tone.

  • (disco) in reply to loose
    loose:
    Camelotbob:
    ISO 9000 certification

    Never had to get involved with this, but all accounts of those I know who did, said you only need to document your procedures to qualify, doesn't care what those procedures are. But I could be wrong.

    Yes, ISO 9000 is all about repeatability, not correctness or efficiency. As long as you document that your process is hammering the square peg in the round hole and you do it every time, you're ISO 9000 compliant.

    As you can imagine, this is all about private equity making factory floors more efficient rather than office workers that need flexibility to respond to unexpected problems, let alone anything to do with software development, but some managers love to hammer that square peg into any hole.

  • (disco) in reply to abarker
    abarker:
    Don't … need … another … religion … flamewar.

    A factual comment about the proportion of sedevacantcists to the general population is hardly a flamewar, nor is an accurate observation on the period of the multi-Popes. So perhaps you should tell us the comment you had an urge to make so we can see if, in fact, you were likely to start a flamewar.

  • (disco) in reply to foxyshadis
    foxyshadis:
    Yes, ISO 9000 is all about repeatability, not correctness or efficiency. As long as you document that your process is hammering the square peg in the round hole and you do it every time, you're ISO 9000 compliant.

    ISO9001 is about the control of R&D. The object of ISO9000 from start to finish is in fact that you design a product to meet a specification, manufacture it to that specification, and deal with customer problems. It is assumed that you want to stay in business, since no general standard can possibly cover whether your product is a good idea or not. To document hammering a square peg into a round hole you would need a specification that says, explicitly, that is what you are doing. I'm not going to deliver a lecture on ISO9000 because (a) nobody would read it and (b) I used to get paid for implementing it and I see no reason to tell people for free what I got paid for. But I will say this; I was once in a conversation at a conference with some German engineers, and a British colleague asked one of them if he had a BMW. To which he got the reply "No, I have an Opel. Because Opel and Ford understand quality. But Mercedes and BMW just have lots of technicians to fix the things that go wrong." (He was referring to German Ford and Opel.) Implementing ISO9001 properly in a software environment isn't actually difficult because all the standard toolchains adhere to it. If you follow a methodology of reviews, walkthroughs, good discipline on checking in and out and merging, test and QA - that is ISO9000. My own perception over the years is that a lot of American engineers and managements resent something that has NIH written all over it - but what actually happened was that people like Deming got little traction in the US whereas their ideas were taken up in Europe and Japan, and then came back to the US again - after their application by the Japanese had led to the Japanese manufacturing boom.

  • (disco) in reply to kupfernigk

    So... This was the free one? Or just a sampler? :trollface: 😊

  • (disco) in reply to abarker
    abarker:
    kupfernigk:
    Steve_The_Cynic:
    Read about sedevacantists some time. They claim that for some time (Vatican II is often mentioned) there hasn't been a legitimate Pope. (Name from a Latin construction for "empty seat".)

    That's OK, at one time there were three of them so a period of apapacy is needed to catch up the 1:1 pope-duration relationship. Seriously, though, these people need to consider what happens if you ask the average person in the (Western) Street "Who is the Pope?". Hint: almost none of them are going to say "Well, since the antiPope John XXII called Vatican II and claimed that God didn't write the Bible in Latin, there hasn't been one."

    Must … resist … urge … to … comment.

    Don't … need … another … religion … flamewar.

    As the others say, there isn't a flamewar here. Unless you're saying you are trying not to start one?

    My comment was a sort of desperately inadequate joke about the standard examples of "tautologically" true statements, notably the example of the Pope, and his state of religion. My desperately inadequate joke was the some people would say that there isn't even a Pope at the moment, and (by a sort of extension), that the individual currently called the Pope by the majority is an imposter, and possibly even a heretic and therefore not really a Catholic.

    As I said, a desperately inadequate joke, because it requires too much intelligence on the part of the listener. There. I think I've managed to insult the entire readership of this forum. Is there a badge for that?

  • (disco) in reply to Steve_The_Cynic
    Steve_The_Cynic:
    My desperately inadequate joke was the some people would say that there isn't even a Pope at the moment, and (by a sort of extension), that the individual currently called the Pope by the majority is an imposter, and possibly even a heretic and therefore not really a Catholic.

    Ah, but they'd be claiming that there isn't a Pope, not that the Pope is not Catholic. Totally different things.

  • (disco) in reply to kupfernigk
    kupfernigk:
    If you follow a methodology of reviews, walkthroughs, good discipline on checking in and out and merging, test and QA - that is ISO9000.

    It's also "a waste of time" and "getting in the way of getting work done" and "pointless bureaucracy" if you ask my devs. :trolleybus:

  • (disco) in reply to dkf
    dkf:
    Steve_The_Cynic:
    My desperately inadequate joke was the some people would say that there isn't even a Pope at the moment, and (by a sort of extension), that the individual currently called the Pope by the majority is an imposter, and possibly even a heretic and therefore not really a Catholic.

    Ah, but they'd be claiming that there isn't a Pope, not that the Pope is not Catholic. Totally different things.

    Yes, that's what I said, so not different at all. Let me give you a hint:
    Steve_The_Cynic:
    the individual currently called the Pope by the majority is an imposter, and possibly even a heretic and therefore not really a Catholic

    Sounds like I said they'd say he isn't the Pope ("an imposter"), and the the so-called Pope ("the individual currently called the Pope by the majority") might even not be Catholic because, as a potential "heretic", he is espousing something that is not Catholicism...

  • (disco) in reply to xaade

    But some people learn more nothing from it than others.

  • (disco) in reply to Steve_The_Cynic
    kupfernigk:
    A factual comment about the proportion of sedevacantcists to the general population is hardly a flamewar, nor is an accurate observation on the period of the multi-Popes.

    Not really under either of those categories.

    kupfernigk:
    So perhaps you should tell us the comment you had an urge to make so we can see if, in fact, you were likely to start a flamewar.

    Pass. I'm not going to start a flamewar in the interest of determining if I would have started a flameware.


    Steve_The_Cynic:
    Unless you're saying you are trying not to start one?

    Trying not to start one. I had a comment I could easily make regarding the popes that would likely start a debate which could easily escalate into a religious flameware.

    Steve_The_Cynic:
    As I said, a desperately inadequate joke, because it requires too much intelligencebuttumed knowledge on the part of the listenerreader.

    FTFY

  • (disco) in reply to kupfernigk
    kupfernigk:
    Psychopaths will continue to try to get management jobs and succeed on ability to manipulate

    At the place I work at now, I've crossed swords with three psychopaths in the last 7 years (not my boss, she's actually awesome to work for most days). Two of them only once each, the remaining one was a piece of work.

    That one, I warned upper management that he was trouble as I caught him in several lies. I also was able to demonstrate my "failures" in delivering to his requirements were due to his :moving_goal_post: shenanigans (e.g., here's an obvious one: order 10 laptops per his email of hiring 10 new staff for his department, then the following week: "where are my 25 laptops? I need all these people WORKING RIGHT NOW!" (Side note: shenanigans. Love that word.) I wasn't taken seriously at the time; one executive brushed it off as he had a different "management style".

    Vindication (sort of) came within six months, as by then he had pissed off every department head in the company for similar reasons.

    None of those psychopaths work here today. :laughing:

    We have our challenges here, granted (who doesn't?) But I stay because I do see improvements given enough time, and I know most other places are much worse!

  • (disco) in reply to redwizard
    redwizard:
    None of those psychopaths work here today.

    And now they work for the government....

  • (disco) in reply to EatenByAGrue
    EatenByAGrue:
    - High P people, whose preferred style of communication is to say whatever gains them the most political power, regardless of usefulness.

    That sounds like most politicians in Chicagoinsert city/organization of choice here.

  • (disco) in reply to Maciejasjmj

    Look, everybody on the Internet reads Orwell. No points for anyone.

    But (apparently) darned few read Golding. Substitute "Conch shell" for "Talking pillow" and you have "Lord of the Flies," including its inevitable finale.

    {Edit} - Sorry, reading the subject of the 7 am meeting, I'm changing it to "Lord of the Files" - can't stop myself when there's a good pun to be had.

  • (disco) in reply to Maciejasjmj
    Maciejasjmj:
    Look, everybody on the Internet reads Orwell. No points for anyone.

    That's only because the big government advocates aren't educated enough to understand it. So they allow it to be read.

    If not, it would be burnt along with Catcher in the Rye.

  • (disco) in reply to xaade
    xaade:
    Cather in the Rye.

    i read that as "Catheter in the Rye" and winced.......

    my brain is weird.

  • (disco) in reply to xaade

    Yeah, because you can't get Catcher in the Rye anywhere. And they shoot you on sight if you're seen carrying it.

  • (disco) in reply to accalia
    accalia:
    "Catheter in the Rye" and winced.......

    When I think about rye and areas catheters may be involved in I think of whiskey, why the wincing?

  • (disco) in reply to xaade
    xaade:
    That's only because the big government advocates aren't educated enough to understand it. So they allow it to be read.

    Orwell was just too subtle...

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-coleman/2014/05/01/msnbcs-krystal-ball-actually-cites-animal-farm-tale-capitalist-greed

  • (disco) in reply to accalia
    accalia:
    xaade:
    Cather in the Rye.

    i read that as "Catheter in the Rye" and winced.......

    my brain is weird.

    You aren't the only one. I had to read it three times to see what @xaade really typed.

  • (disco) in reply to abarker

    it's good to have company. ;-)

  • (disco) in reply to boomzilla

    That's because everything is subjective and they can't turn it off.

    That's like the guy that said that the Game of Thrones was about Global Warming.

    This is what the "interpretation of art" has gotten us. No concern for what the author or artist intended.

    Lately I've read that it doesn't matter what the artist intended, the interpretation belongs to you.

    Subjective everything is just ruining our ability to understand, communicate, and discover truth in reality.

  • (disco) in reply to accalia

    It's missing one character... my god.

  • (disco) in reply to loose
    loose:
    So... This was the free one? Or just a sampler? 😊
    Discourse don't like / understand my mobile smilies :(
  • (disco) in reply to xaade
    xaade:
    It's missing one character... my god.

    it's not what's missing so much as where it's missing

  • (disco) in reply to Yamikuronue
    Yamikuronue:
    It's also "a waste of time" and "getting in the way of getting work done" and "pointless bureaucracy" if you ask my devs.

    By the sound of it, you tell them something different.

  • (disco) in reply to Yamikuronue

    It's only that when your agile team is almost 20 members.... and kickoff is 3 hours and standups are over an hour.

  • (disco) in reply to kupfernigk

    If I thought QA was a waste of time I wouldn't be a very good QA guru now would I?

  • (disco) in reply to Yamikuronue

    Customers aren't willing to pay for you.

    They're happy to keep swapping bad suppliers and wonder what the problem is.

  • (disco) in reply to xaade
    xaade:
    And now they work for the government.

    No, they are paid by the government. Psychopaths work only for themselves.

  • (disco) in reply to Yamikuronue
    Yamikuronue:
    reviews, walkthroughs, good discipline on checking in and out and merging, test and QA
    xaade:
    agile team
    xaade:
    standups

    You're talking about a different topic than I am. Do keep up.

  • (disco) in reply to kupfernigk
    kupfernigk:
    xaade:
    And now they work for the government.

    No, they are paid by the government. Psychopaths work only for themselves.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSVxV6W99E8

  • (disco) in reply to Yamikuronue

    I wonder why a 20 member agile team, spending 20% of their time on daily meetings, has no time for reviews and walkthroughs and good discipline.

    I know that might not be your teams, but I'm mostly venting right now.

  • (disco) in reply to dkf
    dkf:
    Ah, but they'd be claiming that there isn't a Pope, not that the Pope is not Catholic. Totally different things.

    Indeed, if there is no Pope the content of the papacy is null, and it is meaningless to say that null is (or is not) a Catholic, because null cannot have attributes.

  • (disco) in reply to xaade

    You're the only one talking about that, you tell me.

  • (disco) in reply to kupfernigk
    kupfernigk:
    dkf:
    Ah, but they'd be claiming that there isn't a Pope, not that the Pope is not Catholic. Totally different things.

    Indeed, if there is no Pope the content of the papacy is null, and it is meaningless to say that null is (or is not) a Catholic, because null cannot have attributes.

    Catholics are good at projecting their beliefs unto nonexistent systems, so I'm sure they can apply attributes to null.

  • (disco) in reply to Yamikuronue
    Yamikuronue:
    If I thought QA was a waste of time I wouldn't be a very good QA guru now would I?

    I was attempting to add clarification in case your post was read by the sort of dev who would pass it round the office saying "See? Other people think it's all a waste of time too!"

  • (disco) in reply to xaade
    xaade:
    Catholics are good at projecting their beliefs unto nonexistent systems, so I'm sure they can apply attributes to null.

    Not in any database schema I have a hand in.

  • (disco) in reply to kupfernigk

    Rational people recognize that they just made a memory access violation.

    But sometimes it goes on for years, because the exceptions are being swallowed.

  • (disco) in reply to xaade
    xaade:
    That's because everything is subjective and they can't turn it off.

    That's like the guy that said that the Game of Thrones was about Global Warming.

    This is what the "interpretation of art" has gotten us. No concern for what the author or artist intended.

    Lately I've read that it doesn't matter what the artist intended, the interpretation belongs to you.

    Subjective everything is just ruining our ability to understand, communicate, and discover truth in reality.

    Yes, I, too, quite like the weather we're having lately - it makes the tigers ripen so well.


    Filed under: That's what you meant right?

  • (disco) in reply to xaade
    xaade:
    That's like the guy that said that the Game of Thrones was about Global Warming.

    Only if global warming is due to dragonfire. Just sayin'…

  • (disco) in reply to kupfernigk
    kupfernigk:
    Indeed, if there is no Pope the content of the papacy is null, and it is meaningless to say that null is (or is not) a Catholic, because null cannot have attributes.

    Nah, it's clearly an attribute defined at the class level, even though it would actually be an attribute of the instances of the class. The fact that there's no instances right now doesn't invalidate the fact that any valid instance would have the property by definition.

    Though obviously the papacy must be a nullable reference. Catholicism is obviously not written in C++11

  • (disco) in reply to dkf
    dkf:
    Though obviously the papacy must be a nullable reference. Catholicism is obviously not written in C++11

    From what I have been told by Catholics, it's written in brainf__k. Which isn't object oriented.

  • (disco) in reply to accalia
    accalia:
    i read that as "Catheter in the REye" and winced.
    <!-- Not empty -->
  • (disco)
    Ragnax:
    post withdrawn by author

    Good thing, because that was certain to get you a whoosh :badger: :)

  • (disco) in reply to HardwareGeek
    HardwareGeek:
    Good thing, because that was certain to get you a whoosh

    Blame Discourse freezing after the bloody post and me not being presented the remainder. I swear, I should've known something was up when the bloody post count in the bottom went cuckoo.

Leave a comment on “Uncommon Respect”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article