• (nodebb)

    Not only is Boots using the bad practice of showing detailed exceptions in production, they're also deploying builds made from one of their developer's computers instead of a CI/CD server.

    I guess this also means they do manual deployments which is probably a long multi-step process with multiple steps each of which is opportunity for the poor human involved to make a mistake.

  • (nodebb)

    "These boots are made for crashing" thundered Michael R. "PII of the developer have been removed to protect the not so innocent." You can't hide PHP so easily.

    That is not PHP. Looks more like something from Microslop-land...

  • (nodebb) in reply to Jonathan Lydall

    While I think you're very likely correct that it's a developer's machine being used to build the project, that's not necessarily the case. The build system could be running as a system account named something like BuildMachine that's configured to run the project build under its home directory. There are a few pixels bleeding out below the red redaction, but not quite enough to make an educated guess on the actual username there.

  • Darren (unregistered)

    The image from The Register would've been much better if the duplicates had been highlighted, rather than us all having to play a game of spot the difference.

  • Klimax (unregistered) in reply to ravage84

    As opposed to Open Source Slop?

  • (nodebb) in reply to adamantoise

    Above the image it says "PII of the developer have been removed to protect the not so innocent", if it was something harmless like "BuildMachine" it wouldn't have had to be hidden.

  • (nodebb)

    That's not PHP, it's ASP.NET. Unless that was the joke.

Leave a comment on “Zero to Zero in 0 seconds”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #703378:

Log Out

« Return to Article