• Baron Münchhausen (unregistered) in reply to Kasper

    Ok. Well, did you reboot your computer? :)

  • Bananas (unregistered)

    Not sinister. "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." Hanlon's Razor.

  • Martin (unregistered)

    I once had a customer who stored all his documents in the C:/temp/ directory. He called it an `old habit from his DOS days'. I've never used DOS much, but I think temporarily back then meant the same thing as it does now.

  • (cs) in reply to Bananas
    Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use regular expressions." Now they have two problems.
    ...
    Some IT support people think "I know, I'll have the 1st level grunts use regular expressions." Now they have 2* problems.
  • (cs)

    But one of the files is "HelpdeskPayrollCheckTemplate.doc" and you want to delete that?

    If it is deleted, your department won't get its checks next payday, have it your way!

  • (cs)

    Recently my employer replaced my development machine with a new one. On their schedule, not mine, so this was in the middle of the week. It was a standard windows buildout. Here are the WTFs:

    1. Only company-standard software was installed. All my development tools (visual studio, resharper, mvc4, sql management studio, webstorm, git, perforce, on and on) I had to reinstall myself.

    2. The guy they sent to replace my machine backed up, then restored, my NETWORK SHARED FOLDER contents.

    3. He failed to backup/restore my project folders (source code,etc.) I had to basically hold him hostage until he agreed to do so.

    All told, about 12 hours of my time in the middle of a tight schedule just to get my new machine back to the point it was at.

  • Paul (unregistered)

    There is a definitive guide to the Windows filename matching patterns.

    "File System Behavior Overview", Chapter 7 "Wild Cards"

    The patterns get weird because Microsoft never likes to break existing behaviors dating back to DOS but at the same time allow more sophisticated matches.

    IRP_MJ_DIRECTORY_CONTROL is the affected filesystem operation. Unlike Unix, filename matching is performed by the filesystem driver.. arguably a WTF itself, although handy over network shares.

  • (cs) in reply to DrPepper
    DrPepper:
    Recently my employer replaced my development machine with a new one. On their schedule, not mine, so this was in the middle of the week. It was a standard windows buildout. Here are the WTFs:
    1. Only company-standard software was installed. All my development tools (visual studio, resharper, mvc4, sql management studio, webstorm, git, perforce, on and on) I had to reinstall myself.
    2. The guy they sent to replace my machine backed up, then restored, my NETWORK SHARED FOLDER contents.
    3. He failed to backup/restore my project folders (source code,etc. I had to basically hold him hostage until he agreed to do so.

    All told, about 12 hours of my time in the middle of a tight schedule just to get my new machine back to the point it was at.

    DrPepper:
    Recently my employer replaced my development machine with a new one. On their schedule, not mine, so this was in the middle of the week. It was a standard windows buildout. Here are the WTFs:

    1. Only company-standard software was installed. All my development tools (visual studio, resharper, mvc4, sql management studio, webstorm, git, perforce, on and on) I had to reinstall myself.

    2. The guy they sent to replace my machine backed up, then restored, my NETWORK SHARED FOLDER contents.

    3. He failed to backup/restore my project folders (source code,etc.) I had to basically hold him hostage until he agreed to do so.

    All told, about 12 hours of my time in the middle of a tight schedule just to get my new machine back to the point it was at.

    heh

  • (cs) in reply to Martin
    Martin:
    I once had a customer who stored all his documents in the C:/temp/ directory. He called it an `old habit from his DOS days'. I've never used DOS much, but I think temporarily back then meant the same thing as it does now.

    When I worked for a gov't agency as a contractor I ended up being asked to support various side issues with the clients. Had one guy who was missing important files. Ends up he stores his important files in the recycling bin.

    me: "Are you kidding?!" him: "Well I have never had a problem doing so to date!" me: "Yeah, and the janitor never comes into my office to empty my waste paper basket. Doesn't mean I'm going to start putting my important files in there then complain when someone finally comes to clean it out."

  • JF (unregistered)

    Let's not have a temper tantrum, here...

  • Whateva (unregistered) in reply to DrPepper
    DrPepper:
    Recently my employer replaced my development machine with a new one. On their schedule, not mine, so this was in the middle of the week. It was a standard windows buildout. Here are the WTFs:
    1. Only company-standard software was installed. All my development tools (visual studio, resharper, mvc4, sql management studio, webstorm, git, perforce, on and on) I had to reinstall myself.

    Yes - it's called an SOE. Just because you decide to install random crap on a company computer (not your computer), and then don't bother to tell the SOE team about it, or get the software loaded into the deployment repository ... obviously they should spend 12 hours of THEIR time chasing this crap up for you.

    DrPepper:
    2) The guy they sent to replace my machine backed up, then restored, my NETWORK SHARED FOLDER contents.

    Hmmm .. ok, maybe he did this, maybe he didn't. Judging from your rant I would take it with a grain of salt.

    DrPepper:
    3) He failed to backup/restore my project folders (source code,etc. I had to basically hold him hostage until he agreed to do so.

    Wait ... you chose to store COMPANY (again - not yours) source code on your local machine instead of the secure, controlled location like your "NETWORK SHARED FOLDER"? That's borderline negligence, and yet somehow you maintain "He failed ..."?

    Let me apologise on behalf of all support personnel out there. We are soooo sorry. Nobody realised how super-important you are, or how pathetic we are compared to your ... awesomeness.

    DrPepper:
    All told, about 12 hours of my time in the middle of a tight schedule just to get my new machine back to the point it was at.

    Just one question. If it took 12 hours of your (super valuable, highly skilled) time to install a few applications, how long does it actually take to you to write one?

  • Ed (unregistered) in reply to belzebub

    You can’t argue with stupidity, first they will bring you down to their level. Then they will beat you with experience.

  • (cs) in reply to DrPepper
    DrPepper:
    Recently my employer replaced my development machine with a new one. On their schedule, not mine, so this was in the middle of the week. It was a standard windows buildout. Here are the WTFs:
    1. Only company-standard software was installed. All my development tools (visual studio, resharper, mvc4, sql management studio, webstorm, git, perforce, on and on) I had to reinstall myself.
    That's not a WTF. Desktop technicians install what's supported by your SOE, which is defined by what the business uses. You're an edge case, who is (being a highly trained developer) expected to know how to install their own LOB apps.
    DrPepper:
    2) The guy they sent to replace my machine backed up, then restored, my NETWORK SHARED FOLDER contents.
    Ok, that's a WTF, assuming it wasn't done using USMT which I can imagine being a bit dumb like that (and assuming you aren't talking out your rear).
    DrPepper:
    3) He failed to backup/restore my project folders (source code,etc.) I had to basically hold him hostage until he agreed to do so.
    Not his problem. USMT migrates your profile only. Migrating anything else on the disk should be and is your problem. Besides, your code should be checked in. Substitute "replaced my PC" with "building caught fire" and then who's in the wrong? You're the WTF here.
    DrPepper:
    All told, about 12 hours of my time in the middle of a tight schedule just to get my new machine back to the point it was at.
    Which wouldn't have been an issue if you had your code checked in, and weren't such a primadonna about reinstalling software that takes 30 minutes.
  • Jumentum (unregistered) in reply to ochrist

    This is brilliant. The Daily WTF staff could contemplate the idea of user-voted feature posts.

  • Jumentum (unregistered) in reply to ochrist
    ochrist:
    The position had been filled by a temp, who vanished all of a sudden when trying to help.

    This is brilliant. The Daily WTF staff could contemplate the idea of user-voted feature posts.

  • (cs) in reply to Kyanar
    Kyanar:
    Which wouldn't have been an issue if you had your code checked in, and weren't such a primadonna about reinstalling software that takes 30 minutes.
    ...each... And installing is, as you undoubtedly know, only part of the equation.

    I've got another question for DrPepper though: Why would they change a (by the looks of it) functional computer at all? And if they absolutely have to, why not pick a date / time together with the user?

  • iMalc (unregistered) in reply to Kyanar
    Kyanar:
    DrPepper:
    All told, about 12 hours of my time in the middle of a tight schedule just to get my new machine back to the point it was at.
    Which wouldn't have been an issue if you had your code checked in, and weren't such a primadonna about reinstalling software that takes 30 minutes.
    Wow, you can sure spot the ignorant IT support people in here!

    Installing the more recent versions of Visual Studio literally takes half a day on a reasonable machine, and more than 24 hours on a VM. You sure as heck have to copy the install folder locally first, because if you install it off the network, then it's slower still. Lets not forget the vital service packs as well. Now factor in that I have 4 version of Visual Studio installed. There's minimum a day and a half gone. Now of course Windows will want to install more updates for this stuff. Now, I must re-download and install all the productivity add-ins I had been using. Lets not forget that all of the above probably requires at least half a dozen reboots, all of which cause your stupid inventory software to run again on login, making the first 5 minutes of using my PC horribly slow. Then, assuming I didn't copy the projects folder across but had everything checked in, I have to rebuild all of the components in the product and let it rebuild it's intellisense data. There's another 45 minutes or so gone. PC is unusuable during this time because all cores are maxed out building the code. That's just the Visual Studio dramas, which are only one part of what I need on a daily basis.

    What about my VMs which WONT FIT on my primary hard drive and must be on the second drive? The whole second drive's contents needs to be copied across. There's at least another hour of copying.

    What about all the third party things I have installed and configured for the integration I am working on? Another hour at least, setting that all up again, and that's only for the stuff that applies to the current project I'm working on, not the ones I'll have to get back to next week.

    30 minutes is an utter delusion.

  • iMalc (unregistered)

    At my company, when we get a new PC, we are given at least a week to copy across and reinstall anything required, before giving the old PC back. Even then, I've known some people to justifiably still have the old one up to a month later.

    Of course departments will also helpfully install applications that I do not, and will never have, a use for. E.g. SAP.

  • Wyrd (unregistered)

    Andy showed more tact and restraint than I probably would have been able to muster.

    Good job, Andy.

    -- Furry cows moo and decompress.

  • 7eggert (unregistered) in reply to Bananas

    At some point, there ceases to be a difference. You just need to stop the avalanche of malicious stupidity.

    PS: Blindly using these razor rules is part of the problem. These rules tell you where to search first, not if one of the options is true or even close enough.

  • 7eggert (unregistered) in reply to Whateva
    Whateva:
    DrPepper:
    Recently my employer replaced my development machine with a new one. On their schedule, not mine, so this was in the middle of the week. It was a standard windows buildout. Here are the WTFs:
    1. Only company-standard software was installed. All my development tools (visual studio, resharper, mvc4, sql management studio, webstorm, git, perforce, on and on) I had to reinstall myself.

    Yes - it's called an SOE. Just because you decide to install random crap on a company computer (not your computer), and then don't bother to tell the SOE team about it, or get the software loaded into the deployment repository ... obviously they should spend 12 hours of THEIR time chasing this crap up for you.

    Calling the developement software - not being part of the "the secretary-needs-it" company standard software - crap, tells more about you than you tell about DrPepper.

    DrPepper:
    3) He failed to backup/restore my project folders (source code,etc. I had to basically hold him hostage until he agreed to do so.

    Wait ... you chose to store COMPANY (again - not yours) source code on your local machine instead of the secure, controlled location like your "NETWORK SHARED FOLDER"? That's borderline negligence, and yet somehow you maintain "He failed ..."?

    Let me apologise on behalf of all support personnel out there. We are soooo sorry. Nobody realised how super-important you are, or how pathetic we are compared to your ... awesomeness.

    Unless you want your compile at 11°° to be the last thing for the day, you will have a local repository. And depending on what you are coding now, it may contain the work of days.

    DrPepper:
    All told, about 12 hours of my time in the middle of a tight schedule just to get my new machine back to the point it was at.

    Just one question. If it took 12 hours of your (super valuable, highly skilled) time to install a few applications, how long does it actually take to you to write one?

    Another question: How many lines of code do you need to write per hour in order to speed up installing developement environments? Will office install faster, too, if the secretary was able to type one page per minute?

    Did you get your IT education from the movies?

  • anonymous (unregistered) in reply to iMalc
    iMalc:
    Installing the more recent versions of Visual Studio literally takes half a day on a reasonable machine, and more than 24 hours on a VM. You sure as heck have to copy the install folder locally first, because if you install it off the network, then it's slower still. Lets not forget the vital service packs as well. Now factor in that I have 4 version of Visual Studio installed. There's minimum a day and a half gone. Now of course Windows will want to install more updates for this stuff. Now, I must re-download and install all the productivity add-ins I had been using. Lets not forget that all of the above probably requires at least half a dozen reboots, all of which cause your stupid inventory software to run again on login, making the first 5 minutes of using my PC horribly slow. Then, assuming I didn't copy the projects folder across but had everything checked in, I have to rebuild all of the components in the product and let it rebuild it's intellisense data. There's another 45 minutes or so gone. PC is unusuable during this time because all cores are maxed out building the code. That's just the Visual Studio dramas, which are only one part of what I need on a daily basis.

    What about my VMs which WONT FIT on my primary hard drive and must be on the second drive? The whole second drive's contents needs to be copied across. There's at least another hour of copying.

    What about all the third party things I have installed and configured for the integration I am working on? Another hour at least, setting that all up again, and that's only for the stuff that applies to the current project I'm working on, not the ones I'll have to get back to next week.

    30 minutes is an utter delusion.

    Dev environment installation is a pain, that for sure, but... ... suddenly I don't feel as bad for struggling a couple of hours to get Eclipse up and running as I need it. Plus source control, JVM, and that kind of stuff, 4 to 5 hours.

    Just another reason to thank myself for choosing Java over .Net many years ago.

  • Jeff Grigg (unregistered)

    I've found that "rm -rf /" removes most problems.

    ;->

  • elephant in the room (unregistered) in reply to anonymous

    Guy is obviously a drama queen - 24h install for VS - definitively possible, only his concept of "reasonable machine" probably means 386 with turbo button on. TRWTF, that nobody spotted, if of course Perforce. It's 2014, after all.

    captcha: dignissim - Unwarranted sense of dignity

  • solar (unregistered) in reply to anonymous
    anonymous:
    iMalc:
    Installing the more recent versions of Visual Studio literally takes half a day on a reasonable machine, and more than 24 hours on a VM. You sure as heck have to copy the install folder locally first, because if you install it off the network, then it's slower still. Lets not forget the vital service packs as well. Now factor in that I have 4 version of Visual Studio installed. There's minimum a day and a half gone. Now of course Windows will want to install more updates for this stuff. Now, I must re-download and install all the productivity add-ins I had been using. Lets not forget that all of the above probably requires at least half a dozen reboots, all of which cause your stupid inventory software to run again on login, making the first 5 minutes of using my PC horribly slow. Then, assuming I didn't copy the projects folder across but had everything checked in, I have to rebuild all of the components in the product and let it rebuild it's intellisense data. There's another 45 minutes or so gone. PC is unusuable during this time because all cores are maxed out building the code. That's just the Visual Studio dramas, which are only one part of what I need on a daily basis.

    What about my VMs which WONT FIT on my primary hard drive and must be on the second drive? The whole second drive's contents needs to be copied across. There's at least another hour of copying.

    What about all the third party things I have installed and configured for the integration I am working on? Another hour at least, setting that all up again, and that's only for the stuff that applies to the current project I'm working on, not the ones I'll have to get back to next week.

    30 minutes is an utter delusion.

    Dev environment installation is a pain, that for sure, but... ... suddenly I don't feel as bad for struggling a couple of hours to get Eclipse up and running as I need it. Plus source control, JVM, and that kind of stuff, 4 to 5 hours.

    Just another reason to thank myself for choosing Java over .Net many years ago.

    Suggestion that setup of VS development environment takes longer than Eclipse one, is of course ridiculous.

  • Peter (unregistered) in reply to Kasper

    I called a helpdesk to report a broken screen.

    After rebooting (of course I hadn't thought of that) the first question was "What do you see on your screen?".

    Answer - "nothing, the screen is broken"

    Cue many minutes of repeated 'tests' followed by;

    "What do you see on your screen now?" "Nothing, the screen is broken"

    Sadly the process required that until I had gone through this first level of helpdesk 'support' I couldn't go on to the next level - where the solution was quickly arrived at - provide a new screen!

  • Your Manager (unregistered)

    When you hire foreign nationals who can barely speak english and following a rudimentary support script written on a napkin then this is what a company will get: Unhappy customers, wasted time and money, and basically in the long term HIGHER COSTS.

  • anonymous (unregistered) in reply to Peter
    Peter:
    I called a helpdesk to report a broken screen.

    After rebooting (of course I hadn't thought of that) the first question was "What do you see on your screen?".

    Answer - "nothing, the screen is broken"

    Cue many minutes of repeated 'tests' followed by;

    "What do you see on your screen now?" "Nothing, the screen is broken"

    Sadly the process required that until I had gone through this first level of helpdesk 'support' I couldn't go on to the next level - where the solution was quickly arrived at - provide a new screen!

    That reminds me of the time I had the power supply go bad on my laptop and I tried to navigate the first-level support script to get it replaced under warranty. (Symptoms: the power supply was clicking about once per second and its green LED was doing a reverse sawtooth in sync with the clicking instead of a steady and prolonged high.) After going through the tech's steps (check all the cables, remove the battery, wait [n] minutes, replace battery, power back on, etc.) I finally got him to admit that the power supply was faulty and send me a replacement. Best part: at no point during the support call was I able to touch the actual hardware. I made up the answers. Yeah, I know, that makes me a dick, but I did in fact know what the problem was, and the new power supply did fix it. (And I'd already tried most of what he wanted me to do anyway.)

    Then again, my last support call went like this (after dispensing with trivialities such as my name, and the model and serial number of the equipment in question): "Okay, what seems to be the problem?" - "the colour just went all funky all of a sudden" - "Was it on one side of the screen?" - "yeah, I was just using it and one side went blueish" - "The left side?" - "yes" - "Okay, you'll need to send a request for RMA and a copy of the receipt if you can find it". I was semi-impressed. Apparently that must be a common issue with that particular display model.

  • Chris (unregistered) in reply to Pastebreath

    Are you REALLY asking that?? I think the more proper question would be: Is there one that doesn't?

  • CigarDoug (unregistered) in reply to Chris
    Chris:
    Are you REALLY asking that?? I think the more proper question would be: Is there one that doesn't?
    No, the proper question would be, "Can you see the 'Quote' button to the right of the 'Reply' button?"

    Because if you can't, we have no way of knowing what post you are responding to.

  • (cs) in reply to Rick
    Rick:
    The real WTF to me was that helpdesk wanted to permanently delete those files (using shift+delete.) Unless he expected GBs worth of temp files, why wouldn't he just send them to the Recycle Bin?
    It's probably a bad idea for helpdesk to mess with the Recycle Bin in case the user is using it to archive important files.

    I wish I were joking.

  • (cs) in reply to CigarDoug
    CigarDoug:
    Chris:
    Are you REALLY asking that?? I think the more proper question would be: Is there one that doesn't?
    No, the proper question would be, "Can you see the 'Quote' button to the right of the 'Reply' button?"

    Because if you can't, we have no way of knowing what post you are responding to.

    TRWTF is even having the Reply button

  • CUL8R Computator (unregistered) in reply to ais523

    Not only is the recyle bin a great place to archive important files, but the Deleted Items folder in Outlook is a wonderful place to keep important emails.

    I wish I was joking as well.

  • anonymous (unregistered) in reply to CUL8R Computator

    Speaking of wells, they are great places to store annoying children while company comes to visit.

  • Terr (unregistered) in reply to Whateva
    Whateva:
    Wait ... you chose to store COMPANY (again - not yours) source code on your local machine instead of the secure, controlled location like your "NETWORK SHARED FOLDER"? That's borderline negligence, and yet somehow you maintain "He failed ..."?

    WTF? Having your working-copy on your local disk is completely the RIGHT thing to do.

    1. Network drives are S-L-O-W.
    2. Network drives do not work when there's a LAN glitch or when the file server has maintenance.
    3. If you want to store the code independently and secure, that's what VCS system is for, NOT your personal mapped drive.
    4. His desktop IS a company machine. If the company cannot secure it's own on-site physical hardware, they've got a bigger problem! A virus on the dev box can access network Z: equally as easily as local C: .
  • C (unregistered) in reply to CigarDoug
    CigarDoug:
    Chris:
    Are you REALLY asking that?? I think the more proper question would be: Is there one that doesn't?
    No, the proper question would be, "Can you see the 'Quote' button to the right of the 'Reply' button?"

    Because if you can't, we have no way of knowing what post you are responding to.

    Actually, there IS a way, it's just slower than directly reading the post if it were quoted. Can YOU see those "425860 in reply to 425753" tags right near the 'Quote' and 'Reply' buttons? :p

    Maybe a bit annoying when the replied-to post is on another page and you have to keep the whole reply's URL in the clipboard instead of just its id... But don't say "we have no way of knowing"! :-B

  • Peter Wolff (unregistered)

    scnr to write these lines:

    Ouch. Now my temples are aching because of all those attempts to contemplate those comments in a contemptuous tone. Time for some breathing space (German: Atempause)

    Good thing we aren't developing a game called LastEmperor and we don't use a folder SystemPatches. And we aren't a mine company (Stemple_Order_2013-12-05.docx).

    Have to go now. MustEmpowerColleagues. An atemporal problem.

    P. S.: I doubt a teacher would believe that the homework about Shakespeare's The Tempest has been eaten by 1st level helpdesk...

  • Steven J (unregistered) in reply to Jeff Grigg
    Jeff Grigg:
    I've found that "rm -rf /" removes all problems.

    ;->

    FTFY. Of course, it causes some too...

    CAPTCHA: Abbas. I'm not even sure if that support guy has abbas.

  • Steven J (unregistered) in reply to Your Manager
    Your Manager:
    When you hire foreign nationals who can barely speak english and following a rudimentary support script written on a napkin then this is what a company will get: Unhappy customers, wasted time and money, and basically in the long term HIGHER COSTS.

    I'd be willing to bet that's the problem too. Guy on the other end is probably hearing "no I don't want you to delete things". He may not even understand what Andy was saying.

  • anonymous (unregistered) in reply to Steven J
    Steven J:
    Jeff Grigg:
    I've found that "rm -rf /" removes all problems.

    ;->

    FTFY. Of course, it causes some too...

    CAPTCHA: Abbas. I'm not even sure if that support guy has abbas.It really only causes one problem, and it's an easily solved problem at that - by jumping off a bridge.

  • Sure, Not (unregistered) in reply to Anon

    OMG, where am I? and how did I end up on this site.... Shit, it's 7:30am?? Just a few minutes ago I searched google for "Linux CLI is a bitch" but that was at 10pm last night!!... Oh dear God.. This has got to be the greatest website ever to be created ever, on Earth, or any other Domain. I've been on a reading marathon for 4 hours and I'm just now looking up at the address bar to see where I'm at, I'm sm!rter, thinner, happier, and it seems I'm cured of my stage 3 Attention Deficit Disorder... I have a beard now too. hey! look at that squirrel outside! I should google "yard squirrel" and then click the Images link.. wheres my wife? I need breakfast . . . root@root> sudo apt-get breakfast

    $ error> unknown command *try 'breakfast --help' root@root>exit .......... .......... .....

  • Not, Sure (unregistered)

    breakfast --help

    error> 'unknown command' try error --help apt-get upgrade belly-content -v

  • Andy Dahl (unregistered) in reply to Zemm
    Zemm:
    Uh, that glob shouldn't match those files.

    The original search pattern was intentionally mangled when posting to obfuscate the particular platform.

    Suffice it to say, the live-search result that came up just before the "Support Specialist"'s mouse pointer when flying toward the "Delete" button did indeed contain distressingly important filenames.

  • Troy (unregistered) in reply to Nexzus
    Nexzus:
    * I guess I'll add general Anti-virus craziness in there as well.

    For a while, I had Java and Ant installed on a network disk, because that did not trigger the on-access virus scanner. As a result, it ran orders of magnitude faster.

    When I complained to IT, the solution was to reimage my computer.

  • Norman Diamond (unregistered) in reply to Troy
    Troy:
    Nexzus:
    * I guess I'll add general Anti-virus craziness in there as well.
    For a while, I had Java and Ant installed on a network disk, because that did not trigger the on-access virus scanner. As a result, it ran orders of magnitude faster.
    What? Your virus scanner would happily let your PC execute an infected program as long as the program was read into RAM from a network disk instead of your local disk? Who misunderstood the purpose of a virus scanner, me or the maker of the virus scanner?
    Troy:
    When I complained to IT, the solution was to reimage my computer.
    Instead of changing virus scanners? Well yeah, I guess that's no surprise. That's why they get better jobs than I do.
  • SomYunGui (unregistered) in reply to dtech
    dtech:
    faoileag:
    Paddles:
    In other news, I am pleased to see a complete absence of first/frist/etc. comments so far.
    Probably the frist poster expressed his contempt for the help desk and subsequently had his post deleted on the next (.*temp.*) run.

    Why can we not +1 comments? This needs to be highlighted.

    +1

  • Frank (unregistered)

    FIRST!

  • anonymous (unregistered)

    LAST!

Leave a comment on “A Temporary Problem”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

Log Out

« Return to Article