• Machtyn (unregistered) in reply to Pim
    Pim:
    I'm not sure I get what the WTF is. Quitting your job because the boss's wife claims you're loyal?
    No, quitting your job because the owner and the one and only super-programmer had a huge spat that included fists, spilling into parking lots and a termination. All of which was followed up with paranoia and draconian workplace rules.

    The whole loyal part was inserted for the irony of the situation.

  • (cs) in reply to Grim Fandango
    Grim Fandango:
    Yawn! at the macho posturing and "I would shoot him with my shotgun uzi grenade launching Machine gun" comments.
    No kidding, eh? Who the fuck *doesn't* have a shotgun uzi grenade launching Machine gun...

    But what they wouldn't expect though would be my army of zombie CHIPMUNKS!

    Get him, my pretties!!!

  • Machtyn (unregistered) in reply to QJo
    QJo:
    Grim Fandango:
    Yawn! at the macho posturing and "I would shoot him with my shotgun uzi grenade launching Machine gun" comments.

    Bah! I'd attack him with my police, which I would skilfully wield by means of the 911 on my telephone which I would be deploying from the lofty vantage point of behind the sofa.

    And he bravely ran away, away!

  • (cs) in reply to frits
    frits:
    C-Octothorpe:
    frits:
    I'd pay good money to watch a gym rat fight a heavyset repressed geek. Although, due to lack of cardio on the part of both parties, I wouldn't expect it to last longer than 45 seconds. I give slight advantage to the geek, because he would be the first to resort to using a weapon of opportunity.
    And biting...
    Maybe if he likes the taste of self-tanner.
    Good point.

    I wonder though, if the uber-nerd would need call upon the powers of his Dorito-scented body odor...

  • (cs) in reply to QJo
    QJo:
    Lord Snooty McPosh:
    Actually, if you calmly fetch a knife, you'll may well be charged. British courts have held that it's not self defense if you have time to go get a weapon. There was some talk of changing that, but I do not know the final outcome: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13957587.

    Your word against his. "I happened to be in the kitchen, cutting up some steak ready to put it in the freezer for next week's barbecue, and suddenly I heard this crash ..."

    "And this steak is where now? *scribble scribble* And the chopping board you were using? *scribble scribble* Looks awfully clean to me, sir. *scribble scribble*"

    It can be pretty hard to set up all the forensics right to back up a false claim made on the spur of the minute, you know.

  • (cs) in reply to DaveK
    DaveK:
    QJo:
    Lord Snooty McPosh:
    Actually, if you calmly fetch a knife, you'll may well be charged. British courts have held that it's not self defense if you have time to go get a weapon. There was some talk of changing that, but I do not know the final outcome: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13957587.

    Your word against his. "I happened to be in the kitchen, cutting up some steak ready to put it in the freezer for next week's barbecue, and suddenly I heard this crash ..."

    "And this steak is where now? *scribble scribble* And the chopping board you were using? *scribble scribble* Looks awfully clean to me, sir. *scribble scribble*"

    It can be pretty hard to set up all the forensics right to back up a false claim made on the spur of the minute, you know.

    It's important to make writing noises when you take information.
  • Lone Marauder (unregistered) in reply to QJo
    QJo:
    Bah! I'd attack him with my police, which I would skilfully wield by means of the 911 on my telephone which I would be deploying from the lofty vantage point of behind the sofa.

    At which point your police will arrive 5 minutes later, and call an ambulance to remove your unconscious body from behind said sofa.

    Seriously, the police are there to catch the criminal after a crime has happened, not to prevent it in the first place. Ask anyone that has had to deal with a stalker.

  • (cs) in reply to Lone Marauder
    Lone Marauder:
    QJo:
    Bah! I'd attack him with my police, which I would skilfully wield by means of the 911 on my telephone which I would be deploying from the lofty vantage point of behind the sofa.

    At which point your police will arrive 5 minutes later, and call an ambulance to remove your unconscious body from behind said sofa.

    Seriously, the police are there to catch the criminal after a crime has happened, not to prevent it in the first place. Ask anyone that has had to deal with a stalker.

    I'm sure zunetang has had some experience with this.

  • the beholder (unregistered) in reply to Lone Marauder
    Lone Marauder:
    Seriously, the police are there to catch the criminal after a crime has happened, not to prevent it in the first place. Ask anyone that has had to deal with a stalker.
    Your victims never repeated that mistake, now did they?
  • Bob (unregistered) in reply to boog
    boog:
    ...Paul had the uber-nerd's determination to not take any crap and a significant mass advantage.
    People often underestimate that crazy retard strength nerds can get when they're all worked up.
    Please attempt to show some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.
  • Zune-Tran (unregistered) in reply to QJo
    QJo:
    Zune-Tran:
    eric76:
    I had a boss once who called me up one night and told me him and his wife were having a fight and he needed a place to stay.

    He ended up staying at my house for a couple of weeks while they worked things out.

    ...then his wife moved in with me, too. Then things got interesting.

    Their two sweet, little heads resting on my shoulders...

    Symmetrical puncture wounds. There's a tale out of Twilight for you.

    Those are puncture wounds - I was a little too rough on them and they weren't oiled up enough.

  • (cs) in reply to Lone Marauder
    Lone Marauder:
    Seriously, the police are there to catch the criminal after a crime has happened, not to prevent it in the first place. Ask anyone that has had to deal with a stalker.
    That's why whenever the police arrive during the crime, they always leave and wait for the perpetrator to finish robbing/raping/murdering/etc. before they come back to arrest him. Surely they don't have any authority to help or rescue anyone.
  • (cs) in reply to Bob
    Bob:
    boog:
    ...Paul had the uber-nerd's determination to not take any crap and a significant mass advantage.
    People often underestimate that crazy retard strength nerds can get when they're all worked up.
    Please attempt to show some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.
    Please attempt to show some sensitivity. I had a retarded son who repeated stupid memes all day thinking he was funny or clever, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter. Really, it's not funny AT ALL.
  • Born Texas Proud (unregistered) in reply to QJo
    QJo:
    Grim Fandango:
    Yawn! at the macho posturing and "I would shoot him with my shotgun uzi grenade launching Machine gun" comments.

    Bah! I'd attack him with my police, which I would skilfully wield by means of the 911 on my telephone which I would be deploying from the lofty vantage point of behind the sofa.

    I don't live next-door to a police station.

    Why risk the possible property damage? Besides, when you find out it was an illegal alien, they'll just be shipped over the border and be back next week hopped up on drugs and tequila.

  • Zune-Tran (unregistered) in reply to Zune-Tran
    Zune-Tran:
    QJo:
    Zune-Tran:
    eric76:
    I had a boss once who called me up one night and told me him and his wife were having a fight and he needed a place to stay.

    He ended up staying at my house for a couple of weeks while they worked things out.

    ...then his wife moved in with me, too. Then things got interesting.

    Their two sweet, little heads resting on my shoulders...

    Symmetrical puncture wounds. There's a tale out of Twilight for you.

    Those AREN'T puncture wounds - I was a little too rough on them and they weren't oiled up enough.
    FTFM. Dammit - why won't Alex let me sign up?

  • (cs) in reply to Bob
    Bob:
    boog:
    ...Paul had the uber-nerd's determination to not take any crap and a significant mass advantage.
    People often underestimate that crazy retard strength nerds can get when they're all worked up.
    Please attempt to show some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.
    Was he crazy and strong too? Because otherwise, I wasn't talking about him.
  • geoffrey (unregistered)

    Chuck does seem to have a problem with loyalty. If he came to me for a job, I'd have a tough time overlooking the way he left Steve in the lurch, after all that Steve had done for him.

  • Protogenxl (unregistered)

    There is a local specialty retail store where the owner will fly off the rails at both employees and customers at the slightest hint of a problem. From a bar-code not scanning to having to get product from the stock room.

  • (cs) in reply to Zune-Tran
    Zune-Tran:
    FTFM. Dammit - why won't Alex let me sign up?
    Because he thinks you're the real Zunesis? (If you are the real Zunesis, you've clearly lost a step.)
  • (cs) in reply to geoffrey
    geoffrey:
    Chuck does seem to have a problem with loyalty. If he came to me for a job, I'd have a tough time overlooking the way he left Steve in the lurch, after all that Steve had done for him.
    What's the over/under for the number of bites this troll will get? I'm guessing at least 3.
  • anon (unregistered) in reply to boog
    boog:
    Hater:
    boog:
    Hopefully he can catch.

    You're still here boy?

    Who're you again?
    She/he/it has a strong distaste for "boring" posters and also seems to be extremely jealous of registered users. This coupled with creepy sociopathy makes me think of one poster in particular. I'll give you 3 guesses and the first "Z" don't count.

  • Tonsil (unregistered) in reply to Nederlander
    Nederlander:
    Wow... Odd stuff. I'm Dutch, but it's not quite common to have weapons lying around your house at all. Sure. there probably is a knife somewhere in the kitchen (most likely inside the dishwasher or some drawers between the forks and the spoons.)

    I hope you don't own any good knives. If I ever caught you putting a Wusthof in the dishwasher or a drawer without a guard, I'd take it from you, sharpen it, then stab you with it.

  • (cs) in reply to Grim Fandango
    Grim Fandango:
    Yawn! at the macho posturing and "I would shoot him with my shotgun uzi grenade launching Machine gun" comments.

    Too much of video gameing?

  • English Man (unregistered) in reply to dohpaz42
    dohpaz42:
    Ave:
    Why is everybody implying there was a knife in the story?

    If one should receive a visit from his boss, one should automatically assume he would be carrying a knife?

    Is it something too American and I don't get it?

    In most U.S. states, it's only legal to kill an intruder if they were attacking you. So if somebody breaks in to your house, and you kill them, you "put a knife in their hand" so that you can claim self defense. It's an old running (almost inside) joke for us Americans.

    Now can you explain why it's funny?

  • (cs) in reply to geoffrey
    geoffrey:
    Chuck does seem to have a problem with loyalty. If he came to me for a job, I'd have a tough time overlooking the way he left Steve in the lurch, after all that Steve had done for him.

    I will byte for a bit.

  • (cs) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    Bob:
    boog:
    ...Paul had the uber-nerd's determination to not take any crap and a significant mass advantage.
    People often underestimate that crazy retard strength nerds can get when they're all worked up.
    Please attempt to show some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.
    Please attempt to show some sensitivity. I had a retarded son who repeated stupid memes all day thinking he was funny or clever, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter. Really, it's not funny AT ALL.

    Was he name of Bob?

  • (cs) in reply to DaveK
    DaveK:
    QJo:
    Lord Snooty McPosh:
    Actually, if you calmly fetch a knife, you'll may well be charged. British courts have held that it's not self defense if you have time to go get a weapon. There was some talk of changing that, but I do not know the final outcome: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13957587.

    Your word against his. "I happened to be in the kitchen, cutting up some steak ready to put it in the freezer for next week's barbecue, and suddenly I heard this crash ..."

    "And this steak is where now? *scribble scribble* And the chopping board you were using? *scribble scribble* Looks awfully clean to me, sir. *scribble scribble*"

    It can be pretty hard to set up all the forensics right to back up a false claim made on the spur of the minute, you know.

    "I hadn't actually got round to getting either the steak or the chopping board out! Du-uh! Goodness me, what brand of wood do they chip you stupid plods out of nowadays?"

  • anon (unregistered) in reply to English Man
    English Man:
    dohpaz42:
    Ave:
    Why is everybody implying there was a knife in the story?

    If one should receive a visit from his boss, one should automatically assume he would be carrying a knife?

    Is it something too American and I don't get it?

    In most U.S. states, it's only legal to kill an intruder if they were attacking you. So if somebody breaks in to your house, and you kill them, you "put a knife in their hand" so that you can claim self defense. It's an old running (almost inside) joke for us Americans.

    Now can you explain why it's funny?
    Because here in America murder is funny. Haven't you ever heard the idiom "(comedian's name) killed"?

  • (cs) in reply to anon
    anon:
    English Man:
    dohpaz42:
    Ave:
    Why is everybody implying there was a knife in the story?

    If one should receive a visit from his boss, one should automatically assume he would be carrying a knife?

    Is it something too American and I don't get it?

    In most U.S. states, it's only legal to kill an intruder if they were attacking you. So if somebody breaks in to your house, and you kill them, you "put a knife in their hand" so that you can claim self defense. It's an old running (almost inside) joke for us Americans.

    Now can you explain why it's funny?
    Because here in America murder is funny. Haven't you ever heard the idiom "(comedian's name) killed"?
    Note "(comedian's name) killed" the comedian did not murder. Killing is hilarious, the Darwin Awards even awards people for killing themselves in stupid ways; however 'murder' is reserved for our precious dramas like Law & Order.

  • Gary (unregistered) in reply to Bob
    Bob:
    boog:
    ...Paul had the uber-nerd's determination to not take any crap and a significant mass advantage.
    People often underestimate that crazy retard strength nerds can get when they're all worked up.
    Please attempt to show some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: he was neither strong nor crazy
    FTFY
  • Lone Marauder (unregistered) in reply to boog
    boog:
    Lone Marauder:
    Seriously, the police are there to catch the criminal after a crime has happened, not to prevent it in the first place. Ask anyone that has had to deal with a stalker.
    That's why whenever the police arrive during the crime, they always leave and wait for the perpetrator to finish robbing/raping/murdering/etc. before they come back to arrest him. Surely they don't have any authority to help or rescue anyone.

    They do actually. No, go look it up, we'll wait...

    My point was, that unless you happen to live down the street from the local police precinct, by the time you get someone on the phone from the 911 center (all three times I've had to call, there's been a 2 to 4 minute hold), get in touch with the right emergency responders, give them a description of what's happening, and they dispatch someone to help you, chances are that the criminal has already done what they've come for and are long gone.

  • hijacker_of_threads (unregistered) in reply to geoffrey
    geoffrey:
    Chuck does seem to have a problem with loyalty. If he came to me for a job, I'd have a tough time overlooking the way he left Steve in the lurch, after all that Steve had done for him.
    Totally true. And to top it off NBC is doing a show on him. And he gets a sexy girlfriend too. Lucky bastard.
  • Bob's Son (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    Bob:
    boog:
    ...Paul had the uber-nerd's determination to not take any crap and a significant mass advantage.
    People often underestimate that crazy retard strength nerds can get when they're all worked up.
    Please attempt to show some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.
    Please attempt to show some sensitivity. I had a retarded son who repeated stupid memes all day thinking he was funny or clever, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter. Really, it's not funny AT ALL.
    In Bob's defense, boog is the one responsible for invoking the hated 'r' word.
  • (cs) in reply to neminem
    neminem:
    trtrwtf:
    Rootbeer:
    In before gun nuts asserting "castle doctrine" would give them the right to shoot Steve dead through the front door with one of the many shotguns laying around their houses.

    [confused] I thought the castle doctrine gives you the right to move your king into a more protected position, provided neither the king nor the involved rook have moved and none of the involved squares can be attacked by the enemy? [/confused]

    Funny, I would've assumed the Castle doctrine would state that if you don't know the answer to something, you are required to instead make a snarky, wisecracking pop-culture reference. Or perhaps "find an attractive, smart female detective and hang out with her as much as possible, but don't tell her you like her, cause that would make things too easy."

    I thought it had something to do with inversion of control...

  • Greg (unregistered) in reply to JamesQMurphy
    JamesQMurphy:
    ...I worked for a husband-and-wife-run company back in the early nineties...
    Me too, though I didn't know it when I was hired. My interview was with the "MIS Manager" and my future coworker. I should have noticed the coworker asked most of the technical questions...

    After I got the job I learned the MIS Manager didn't know a byte from a mouse, having never worked with either, but she was the CFO's wife. She retained her maiden name so it wasn't obvious on org charts etc.

    Later I learned that many of the company's customers were only able to make ends meet by stealing a certain percentage from the company, but it was OK because the company played the same trick on its suppliers.

    Then came the day my coworker said "Remember the guy that was touring our data center last week? Well he got murdered yesterday."

    And that's about when I decided to move to another state and change my name...

  • (cs) in reply to Greg
    Greg:
    JamesQMurphy:
    ...I worked for a husband-and-wife-run company back in the early nineties...
    Me too, though I didn't know it when I was hired. My interview was with the "MIS Manager" and my future coworker. I should have noticed the coworker asked most of the technical questions...

    After I got the job I learned the MIS Manager didn't know a byte from a mouse, having never worked with either, but she was the CFO's wife. She retained her maiden name so it wasn't obvious on org charts etc.

    Later I learned that many of the company's customers were only able to make ends meet by stealing a certain percentage from the company, but it was OK because the company played the same trick on its suppliers.

    Then came the day my coworker said "Remember the guy that was touring our data center last week? Well he got murdered yesterday."

    And that's about when I decided to move to another state and change my name...

    you don't tel good tale

  • Nagesh (unregistered) in reply to Greg
    Greg:
    JamesQMurphy:
    ...I worked for a husband-and-wife-run company back in the early nineties...
    Me too, though I didn't know it when I was hired. My interview was with the "MIS Manager" and my future coworker. I should have noticed the coworker asked most of the technical questions...

    After I got the job I learned the MIS Manager didn't know a byte from a mouse, having never worked with either, but she was the CFO's wife. She retained her maiden name so it wasn't obvious on org charts etc.

    Later I learned that many of the company's customers were only able to make ends meet by stealing a certain percentage from the company, but it was OK because the company played the same trick on its suppliers.

    Then came the day my coworker said "Remember the guy that was touring our data center last week? Well he got murdered yesterday."

    And that's about when I decided to move to another state and change my name...

    I am laugh at your choice: "unregistered" being amusing sirname.

  • An Old Hacker (unregistered) in reply to boog
    boog:
    Lone Marauder:
    Seriously, the police are there to catch the criminal after a crime has happened, not to prevent it in the first place. Ask anyone that has had to deal with a stalker.
    That's why whenever the police arrive during the crime, they always leave and wait for the perpetrator to finish robbing/raping/murdering/etc. before they come back to arrest him. Surely they don't have any authority to help or rescue anyone.

    You mean like they did in Columbine?

  • Ricky (unregistered) in reply to QJo
    QJo:
    Bah! I'd attack him with my police, which I would skilfully wield by means of the 911 on my telephone which I would be deploying from the lofty vantage point of behind the sofa.
    Clearly you've never called 911. Or read the book "Call 911 and Die". Cops have no duty (in the USA) to protect you. Only to write up a report 45 minutes after you're dead.

    Protip: Tell the nice people at 911 (once you're not on hold any more) you think the badguy has a few kilos of $BANNED_SUBSTANCE in his car. Cops will be there in 90 seconds to divvy up the loot. You'll still be dead, but the badguy might be hanging around long enough that the cops can take out their frustrations.

  • (cs) in reply to Bob's Son
    Bob's Son:
    In Bob's defense, boog is the one responsible for invoking the hated 'r' word.
    Bullshit! I've never been responsible in my life.
  • (cs) in reply to Protogenxl
    Protogenxl:
    There is a local specialty retail store where the owner will fly off the rails at both employees and customers at the slightest hint of a problem. From a bar-code not scanning to having to get product from the stock room.

    How, pray tell, does this store remain in business?

  • (cs) in reply to ObiWayneKenobi
    ObiWayneKenobi:
    Protogenxl:
    There is a local specialty retail store where the owner will fly off the rails at both employees and customers at the slightest hint of a problem. From a bar-code not scanning to having to get product from the stock room.

    How, pray tell, does this store remain in business?

    I'm guessing by rule of the Law of Supply and Demand. Think "Soup Nazi".

  • (cs) in reply to An Old Hacker
    An Old Hacker:
    boog:
    Lone Marauder:
    Seriously, the police are there to catch the criminal after a crime has happened, not to prevent it in the first place. Ask anyone that has had to deal with a stalker.
    That's why whenever the police arrive during the crime, they always leave and wait for the perpetrator to finish robbing/raping/murdering/etc. before they come back to arrest him. Surely they don't have any authority to help or rescue anyone.

    You mean like they did in Columbine?

    And Vancouver, BC (Canada)... The police there JUST released a statement that they're RECOMMENDING charging 60 individuals. God forgid they ever catch anybody before or during the committing of a crime...
  • (cs) in reply to Greg
    Greg:
    JamesQMurphy:
    ...I worked for a husband-and-wife-run company back in the early nineties...
    Me too, though I didn't know it when I was hired. My interview was with the "MIS Manager" and my future coworker. I should have noticed the coworker asked most of the technical questions...

    After I got the job I learned the MIS Manager didn't know a byte from a mouse, having never worked with either, but she was the CFO's wife. She retained her maiden name so it wasn't obvious on org charts etc.

    Later I learned that many of the company's customers were only able to make ends meet by stealing a certain percentage from the company, but it was OK because the company played the same trick on its suppliers.

    Then came the day my coworker said "Remember the guy that was touring our data center last week? Well he got murdered yesterday."

    And that's about when I decided to move to another state and change my name...

    I think I'm missing the punchline here. Like...

    Co-worker: Hey, remember that guy that was touring our data center last week? Well, he got murdered yesterday.

    You: Murdered? How?

    Co-worker: Well, <boss> caught him looking at <wifey>. It wasn't pretty. Blood everywhere. We hid the body. Very unpleasant.

  • Hater (unregistered) in reply to frits
    frits:
    ObiWayneKenobi:
    Protogenxl:
    There is a local specialty retail store where the owner will fly off the rails at both employees and customers at the slightest hint of a problem. From a bar-code not scanning to having to get product from the stock room.

    How, pray tell, does this store remain in business?

    I'm guessing by rule of the Law of Supply and Demand. Think "Soup Nazi".
    Woe cares you think? I go attemp back autofelate now...

  • Rfoxmich (unregistered)

    After all you've done for me and I'm still frist?

  • Greg (unregistered) in reply to ObiWayneKenobi
    ObiWayneKenobi:
    Greg:
    JamesQMurphy:
    ...I worked for a husband-and-wife-run company back in the early nineties...
    Me too, though I didn't know it when I was hired. My interview was with the "MIS Manager" and my future coworker. I should have noticed the coworker asked most of the technical questions...

    After I got the job I learned the MIS Manager didn't know a byte from a mouse, having never worked with either, but she was the CFO's wife. She retained her maiden name so it wasn't obvious on org charts etc.

    Later I learned that many of the company's customers were only able to make ends meet by stealing a certain percentage from the company, but it was OK because the company played the same trick on its suppliers.

    Then came the day my coworker said "Remember the guy that was touring our data center last week? Well he got murdered yesterday."

    And that's about when I decided to move to another state and change my name...

    I think I'm missing the punchline here. Like...

    Co-worker: Hey, remember that guy that was touring our data center last week? Well, he got murdered yesterday.

    You: Murdered? How?

    Co-worker: Well, <boss> caught him looking at <wifey>. It wasn't pretty. Blood everywhere. We hid the body. Very unpleasant.

    I assumed he was murdered because he went a little overboard on the stealing from the company thing. But that's just my guess; murderers don't always provide a rational justification.

  • (cs) in reply to Lone Marauder
    Lone Marauder:
    boog:
    Lone Marauder:
    Seriously, the police are there to catch the criminal after a crime has happened, not to prevent it in the first place. Ask anyone that has had to deal with a stalker.
    That's why whenever the police arrive during the crime, they always leave and wait for the perpetrator to finish robbing/raping/murdering/etc. before they come back to arrest him. Surely they don't have any authority to help or rescue anyone.
    They do actually. No, go look it up, we'll wait...
    My sarcasm wasn't meant to imply that it never happens, but simply that it doesn't always happen. Sure anyone could find a few instances where the cops knowingly left a crime in progress. But I doubt this is what usually happens.
    Lone Marauder:
    My point *was*, that unless you happen to live down the street from the local police precinct, by the time you get someone on the phone from the 911 center (all three times I've had to call, there's been a 2 to 4 minute hold), get in touch with the right emergency responders, give them a description of what's happening, and they dispatch someone to help you, chances are that the criminal has already done what they've come for and are long gone.
    Fair enough - the police may try to prevent the crime in the first place, but are often unable to do so, so don't count on it. I'll buy that.
  • (cs) in reply to Hater
    Hater:
    frits:
    ObiWayneKenobi:
    Protogenxl:
    There is a local specialty retail store where the owner will fly off the rails at both employees and customers at the slightest hint of a problem. From a bar-code not scanning to having to get product from the stock room.

    How, pray tell, does this store remain in business?

    I'm guessing by rule of the Law of Supply and Demand. Think "Soup Nazi".
    Woe cares you think? I go attemp back autofelate now...
    Lay off the pills, bro.

  • (cs) in reply to frits
    frits:
    Hater:
    frits:
    ObiWayneKenobi:
    Protogenxl:
    There is a local specialty retail store where the owner will fly off the rails at both employees and customers at the slightest hint of a problem. From a bar-code not scanning to having to get product from the stock room.

    How, pray tell, does this store remain in business?

    I'm guessing by rule of the Law of Supply and Demand. Think "Soup Nazi".
    Woe cares you think? I go attemp back autofelate now...
    Lay off the pills, bro.
    Or start mixing them with alcohol.

Leave a comment on “Aggressive Management”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

Log Out

« Return to Article