- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
Irony. You're doing it wrong.
Admin
Damn you. I just had a flashback to the Game Which Shall Not Be Named.
Damn you!
Admin
Shotguns? Pfft. Such an amateur tool. My would-be assassin isn't getting past the murder hole, even if the archers, moat with sharks and raised iron drawbridge don't stop them (the fricken' laser beams are on back-order from Amazon).
Admin
BTW-You're doing it wrong.
Admin
Where I grew up, baseball bats were very popular sporting items. Nobody plays baseball there, though.
Admin
Admin
There have been times when I thought to myself that management was insane, and then charitably conceded that I'm glad I don't have to do what they have to do (because their jobs often require them to appear insane).
This is insanity.
Admin
Admin
Admin
Man, you having fun chatting with your sock-puppet?
Admin
Admin
Well, yes and no: There is a difference.
A baseball bat isn't considered a weapon unless you actually assault (or batter) someone with it. Bow and arrow is always a weapon and is regulated as such (even if not usually as tightly as firearms).
Admin
My best guess is it's either Zunesis, Nagesh, or someone from the great TDWTF hivemind. Either way, I couldn't care less what they think, and only respond for my own amusement.
Admin
Admin
So is fencing.
Admin
Admin
Version 1.1. TheDailyWTF has been improved significantly.
// ==UserScript== // @name Nogesh // @namespace http://thedailywtf.com/nogesh // @description No more gesh v1.1 // @include http://thedailywtf.com/Comments/* // ==/UserScript==
var comments = document.getElementsByClassName("CommentContainer"); for(var i=0;i<comments.length;i++) { var comment = comments[i]; var html = comment.innerHTML.toLowerCase(); if (html.indexOf("nagesh") != -1) { comment.innerHTML="Nogesh"; } if (html.indexOf("hater") != -1) { comment.innerHTML="Some lame comment by Hater"; } }
Admin
Wow. This story was as much of a wtf as it could have been, but the comments have provided sufficient - if bizarre - entertainment.
+1 everybody!
Admin
I'm totally calling BS on that.
There is a world of difference between charging someone and the initial arrest. Because of rules such as habeas corpus and double jeopardy which are imperative to the protection of a just and free society, there are two distinct steps to the process: the prevention or stopping of an action and the filing of charges. You don't want to file the charges until you've got your evidence collected - because if you mess up and you don't have all the evidence that you could have had and don't get as significant a sentence as would be appropriate, you won't get a second chance. You can't hold an individual without charges for longer than a couple of days (exact length differs depending on jurisdiction, but normally 48 hrs).
In riots, arresting people is secondary - an officer who arrests someone is unable to deal with the riot until that individual is put in a car which could easily be 5 minutes - and may need to take them all the way to the station before he can return to deal with the riot. When the officers could easily be outnumbered by rioters in extreme excess of 10:1, and considering how vulnerable an individual officer would be while arresting someone (or, alternatively, the number of other officers that would need to cover him), how difficult it would be to isolate individual rioters from the middle of a crowd of rioters, the length of time other rioters get to continue rioting while the officer completes processing of the one individual, it is amongst the worst ways to deal with riots. The priority of riot police is to first minimize casualties and second minimize property damage. To arrest people individually like that guarantees a failure on the second requirement. So what are their tactics: disperse the crowd. Dispersement means that you have almost no chance of actually arresting someone, but you have a far greater chance of getting them to leave the area and stop being a mob. It focuses energy away from destruction and towards movement meeting the second requirement and if you can do it in a way to minimize injuries, then you've met the first objective. If you do it right, they'll go home. Especially when most of them know they're in the wrong like they would've been when rioting about a Canucks loss and reducing the density of the crowd (by having them disperse) would allow many of them to get their wits about them and go home.
They did it right.
Admin
Admin
But not even cannibals will actually eat dead comedians. Apparently they taste funny.
Admin
I've just thought: did Steve then go and get a job as a security guard on the Jerry Springer show? He needs a show of his own, that man.
Admin
Everyone wasn't implying there was a knife. One person was replying to another (as indicated by the comment number links) but forgot to use the quote button.
Make sense now?
Admin
Barely made it. You only beat them by four minutes.
Admin
Hi there Paul, you gonna tell us what that fight was about, then?
Admin
They are also very satisfying to use for their original intended purpose. That is, for hitting baseballs. Baseball: that's the correct term for redneck's head, isn't it?
Admin
Admin
Admin
Steve knew just enough about programming to be dangerous. His insistence on forcing me to use "n" as the variable name for all for..next type loops was stupid. Everyone knows "i" is the correct name for these things!
Err, OK, I'm not really that Paul (good catch though!) but that sounds entirely plausible to me.
Admin
"Baseball" and "kneecap" can be interchangeable, too.
Captcha: "aliquam", sounds like something you might take for the pain after being the subject of a few innings of "kneecap baseball".
Admin
We all already know that. Nothing surprising. You don't need to admit that.
Admin
Admin
[quote user="Patrick"] Wow... Odd stuff. I'm Dutch, but it's not quite common to have weapons lying around your house at all. Sure. there probably is a knife somewhere in the kitchen (most likely inside the dishwasher or some drawers between the forks and the spoons.)[/quote]
Aha, but leaving sports equipment by the door is perfectly fine. And last I checked, both Archery and Baseball are valid sports.[/quote]
I have a (real, hand forged and sharpened) greatsword hanging on the wall in my living room. does that count?
Admin
Admin
Put 00 buckshot or a slug in your shotgun and the average front door isn't a problem
Admin
[quote user="Fedaykin"][quote user="Patrick"] Wow... Odd stuff. I'm Dutch, but it's not quite common to have weapons lying around your house at all. Sure. there probably is a knife somewhere in the kitchen (most likely inside the dishwasher or some drawers between the forks and the spoons.)[/quote]
Aha, but leaving sports equipment by the door is perfectly fine. And last I checked, both Archery and Baseball are valid sports.[/quote]
I have a (real, hand forged and sharpened) greatsword hanging on the wall in my living room. does that count?[/quote]
I have razor-sharp wit and listen to very heavy music, that should be weapons enough.
Actually, they did an experiment round our way not so long ago. Shopkeepers who were fed up of the crowds of no-good children hanging around took to playing classical music from loudspeakers outside, in the hope that it would chase the vermin away. It worked.
Admin
Admin
For our non US friends, and maybe some US ones that have no clue.....
You kill someone in your home, or elsewhere it is murder. Plain and simple. That might not be the exact charge, but you did a bad thing. Now the question becomes what was your defense if any.
You can claim self defense. In most states you are required to not start the fight and also try to retreat. If you met those conditions then self defense is still something you must prove. You must prove you had no choice.
Castle laws in most places say you don't have to try to retreat or other things if you are legally in your home or car and the other person is not legally entering. They don't have to have committed a crime yet. When that is the case you can claim self defense and the DA must prove that it was not.
Walking in a dark alley I shoot someone, I need to prove it was self defense.
Someone in my yard, and I shoot him. I will be charged with a crime. At the trial if I can show he was shooting at me through a window, thus it was self defense, I should get off.
Someone comes into my house in the middle of the night, and I shoot him, most likely I will not be charged based on self defense and Castle laws. Now if the DA can prove I lured the person into my house to shoot him, then I'm in big trouble.
Bottom line Castle laws are not an automatic get out jail free card. They shift the burden of proof if you claim self defense.
Sorry for the real life useful information. Now back to your normal bitching about the story.
Admin
Admin
He already has one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Steve_Wilkos_Show
Akismet says your comment was spam - fuck you akismet.
Admin
Here in Texas we have strong Castle law that explicitly allows a person to use force to stop an intruder who "unlawfully or forcefully enters or attempts to enter the victim’s place of residence, vehicle, or place of employment."
Note that the OP doesn't have to wait for Steve to actually batter down his front door before using force to stop him.
We don't have many home invasions here.
Admin
I am not meking any other coment except for one make with my registred name. Alex can verify this by check on IP address.
Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin