- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
-
Error'd
- Most Recent Articles
- Stop Poking Me!
- Operation Erred Successfully
- A Dark Turn
- Nothing Doing
- Home By Another Way
- Coast Star
- Forsooth
- Epic
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
Expert: "X" is the unknown quantity; "spurt" is a drip under pressure.
Admin
This give me ideas for candidates interview in the following weeks :D
Admin
Admin
This does not prove the worthlessness of E's papers, if anything it shows that nonsense may be of value as inspiration.
In the sciences it is more common that research is what is called "grounded" and intrinsically empirical, but ground-breaking concepts usually come from what for "normal people" seems like insanity.
That said, most gibberish is just crazy. But do not commit the fallacy of positing a causal (or any kind of) link between E perceiving gibberish as inspiring and E's writings to necessarily be gibberish.
Admin
Jeffery should leave a few more papers in his cube. I'd like to know when his Expert gets the clue...
Admin
Admin
I think I need to add a few "white papers" to my resume.
captcha: doom (are you trying to tell me something?)
Admin
could there be a subtle psychology going on here, where E trusts his counterpart and does not want to look foolish or even perhaps likes his counterpart and does not wish to make him look foolish? Still, I like the idea in principle, even if in practice it may not prove as telling as it seems on the surface...
captcha: stinky. Yup, I need a shower alright, even the internet thinks I stink...
Admin
sorry, even the internet stinks i think.
Admin
printing and handing to 'expert' co-worker now
Admin
Similar situation - several years ago, a magazine editor invited poetry submissions from a particular community. "I write sonnets," I said. "Would you consider those?"
"Well, of course," he said. "I'm an EXPERT on poetry. I ESPECIALLY appreciate the obscure and historical forms." So I submitted a few sonnets. Then he sent them back, as editors do, with his suggestions.
The poems are too short. Could I make them longer?
The meter feels relentless and rigid. Could I try something more lyrical?
The rhyme scheme is strange and feels unnatural. Could I make it something more like an ABAB format?
A sonnet, for those who don't know, is exactly fourteen lines long. Every line is in iambic pentameter. The scheme is prescribed under a series of complex rules which dictate not only which lines rhyme, but how the lines relate to one another.
Of course, he's an EXPERT. I just write poetry.
Some of you may be familiar with Dissociated Press. I pulled out a word-based implementation and ran it across the character descriptions on a horror MUD. The result was a collection of angst-filled gothic gibberish. I grabbed large swaths of it, carefully
arranged the lines in such a way as to seem like it was poetry,
and submitted the results.
He was ecstatic. Unfortunately, before he published the issue in which they were to appear, he came across me on a forum talking about what an idiot he was and how I totally bamboozled him with computer-generated garbage.
Admin
Yeah it just proves the worthlessness of E.
Why would cryptographers comment on Moore's Law to begin with? I can't even figure out what the hell the location-identity split is, but it appears to involve middleware (i.e. nothing to do with cryptography as a study and even less to do with the price of transistors).
Admin
The paper itself is brilliant. It looks complicated, the figures themselves are impossible to understand (the block size (celsius) is perfect!), and the references are... so fun that I don't even understand how it can't be read without rofling all the day (c'mon! C. Darwin wrote "Operating Systems considered harmfull" together with Sutherland! and what about "Emulating red-black trees and Ipv7"?).
Having a PHd level guy who can't spot this as a fake is quite disturbing but hey, it's so brilliant.
I save it for future use. Thanks everyone :)
Admin
Admin
And so, for the litmus test, anyone care to conjecture where this 'expert' got his ph.d in computer science(?) from? I'd guess "not Stanford". Unless it's stanford-degree-for-a-dollar.com.
Admin
this reminds me of my boss
PhD in DB management, MS in Computer engineering
and yet constantly trying to give us advice on how to DESIGN our websites.
I almost wish they knew what they were talking about so I could get some actual insight when I run into roadblocks in my apps. oh well. :) Reminds me a lot of the MBA mentality -- some kind of undeserved self-importance.
Admin
Admin
There is no WTF here.
Marketing and Sales people use similar products to generate the language they speak at each other. To the rest of us, it sounds like a load of BS.
So, why can't we?
Admin
Admin
http://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf
Admin
So did E make sure to document the process he used to convert millibars to teaspoons?
Admin
There's a vanishingly small but non-zero chance that a generated paper might actually make sense. Maybe he just got really lucky.
Admin
I thought the Turing test was to see if a computer could successfully fool a human into thinking it was another human. So, shouldn't this be Passing the Turing Test?
Admin
Let us not forget Sokal, the grand-mack-daddy of smacking down self-important pseudo-cognesanti academics with a hoax paper full of gibberish:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_Affair
Admin
Maybe he's on E!
Seriously, this expert worked on the paper for a half hour, and highlighted notes on the page. The article points this out. He's dumb to have wasted the time, even if he knew better. So, it's hard to believe he realized it wasn't a real research paper.
Admin
This reminds me of the Parking Lot Is Full strip, "chicken"
http://plif.andkon.com/archive/wc072.gif
Admin
For some reason, he didn't publish the poems. I can't imagine why.
It's not like he could do anything. It was still my poetry.
Admin
Dude, you missed the obvious. That's where the big WTF is: an expert, who, yes, DIDN'T realize he was reading gibberish.
Duh. And just so that you know, I wholly believe this story. I've seen such "experts".
Admin
Ah, the wonders of computer-generated babble. Useful for so many things, it appears!
The pig in what? Ketchup. No quack.
Admin
Poor guy, Maybe he shouldn't be such an asshat all the time.
Admin
No, for two reasons. First, the turing test assumes a "judge" with reasonable intelligence. E doesn't qualify. More importantly, the turing test is a conversation. It's relatively easy to produce something written that can pass for human creation. It's MUCH more difficult to carry on a conversation.
Admin
-Harrow.
Admin
I once wrote a program which generated random marketing gibberish, using a lot of buzzwords.
Too bad that I lost its source when I did a hard drive cleanup. But it shouldn't be that hard to rewrite.
Admin
I got them both right!!!
*the joke is in honor of a dear departed friend, Wilson Rogers
Admin
Admin
Yes, the concept is similar.
Admin
You really ought to think an idea through yourself before you start advising people about how to interpret it.
Admin
Those SCIgen articles are really like the texts my groupmates write for an report that we have to write at my university...
The only difference is that the SCIgen articles are grammatically and syntactically correct.
CAPTCHA: pinball (if I only had time for that...)
Admin
I, for one, am curious about the legitimacy of E's "PhD" credentials to begin with. Perhaps I'm simply reading too much into things, but his reference to his "PhD thesis" put up a big red flag for me. Masters degrees require a thesis. PhD degrees require a dissertation.
Admin
I bookmarked the SCIGen page for when I go for my masters degree.
Should be a breeze.
Admin
The references are a bit repetitive, though:
Admin
GoogleFight says: "doctoral thesis" - 1.15M "doctoral dissertation" - 1.09M
Doesn't seem like either is more prevalent.
Admin
interface show even nurse positive jam
Admin
NO QUACK.
Admin
Nurse positive jam? We have to many nurses and they are jamming up the system? I'll take a few thank you!
Admin
Admin
So true.
Admin
Wow I really wish I had had this utility when I was in grad school!
Admin
You know, I have absolutely no idea how to reply to the original post. An invisible button, maybe? Alas and alack, I am never going to be "Frist..."
I would, however, like to defend academics, particularly in the field of CompSci, because my father was one from before I was born ... and a damn good one. Taught well, published a quarter of a halfway decent book, and didn't put up with crap.
The saying that "those who can, do; those who can't, teach" was always meant as a sardonic quip. Sadly, with the fax-machine nature of today's PhDs, it has now been outmoded. These days, apparently, "those who think they can do are WTF; those who don't WTF, teach; those who know they can't do, but don't even realise that they are a WTF, go back from academia and piss people around."
And let's not even think about PHBs.
Admin