• Disgruntled DBA (unregistered)

    Damn you Metric System!  Damn you to hell!

  • Sen. Frist (unregistered)

    First! [pi]

  • Spencer (unregistered)

    It's obvious: first convert pounds to kilograms (0.453592 kg/lb), then convert from kilograms to tons. (907.1847 kilograms in a ton).

    WTF?!

  • Mike (unregistered)

    Maybe this was done by somebody who only understood metric and was saying to themselves "wtf is a pound?".  .4535924 kg = 1lb and 907.1847 kg = 1 ton.

  • James R. Carr (unregistered)

    The real WTF here is that Americans still don't use the metric system.        

  • Mike Edenfield (unregistered)

    Actually, the math is pretty close.  The numbers are clearly for a metric ton, ~2204 lbs = 1 metric ton.  Using his math, 2204 lbs = 1.102 tons.  I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt that he (a) got a rather imprecise conversion factor (I beleive the actual conversion factor is an irrational number), and (b) rounded poorly.

    --Mike

  • RageingNonsense (unregistered)

    Something leads me to belive that this function was never intended for doing an actual conversion. Why would one need anything beyond an inline function to do such a trivial conversion? What I am thinking, is that the return value of this function was intended to be used as a modifier. Perhapse for a metric conversion?

    What intrigues me is the little "m"'s at the ends of the numbers. Unless this is a code construct I am not familiar with, I'd love to see what role it plays.

  • (cs)

    What this is doing is converting to kilogrammes, and then from kilos to short (US) tons.  It's an approach which would make sense for PoundsToTonnes, but not to either of the other tons.
    My guess is that this was automatically generated by something that only had conversion factors to and from SI units and wasn't very clever.

  • (cs)

    all I can say is [|-)]

  • (cs) in reply to Mike
    Anonymous:

    Maybe this was done by somebody who only understood metric and was saying to themselves "wtf is a pound?".  .4535924 kg = 1lb and 907.1847 kg = 1 ton.

    He should've converted to dollars first.

  • Eyrie Owl (unregistered)

    please tell me no one needed the link to the answer....

  • (cs) in reply to Mike Edenfield
    Anonymous:
    Actually, the math is pretty close.  The numbers are clearly for a metric ton, ~2204 lbs = 1 metric ton.  Using his math, 2204 lbs = 1.102 tons.  I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt that he (a) got a rather imprecise conversion factor (I beleive the actual conversion factor is an irrational number), and (b) rounded poorly.

    --Mike



    Or, just maybe, he was converting into a standard ton.  By definition 2000 lbs = 1 ton.  Using his math, 1999.9997795 lbs = 1 ton.  That is a heck of a lot closer than the 10% error to your theory.
  • (cs) in reply to James R. Carr
    Anonymous:
    The real WTF here is that Americans still don't use the metric system.        


    No, the real WTF is that the rest of the world has been duped into using that inferior system.
  • Yoey (unregistered) in reply to RevMike
    RevMike:
    Anonymous:
    The real WTF here is that Americans still don't use the metric system.        


    No, the real WTF is that the rest of the world has been duped into using that inferior system.


    Because a system based on density of water is pure madness.
  • (cs) in reply to RevMike
    RevMike:
    Anonymous:
    Actually, the math is pretty close.  The numbers are clearly for a metric ton, ~2204 lbs = 1 metric ton.  Using his math, 2204 lbs = 1.102 tons.  I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt that he (a) got a rather imprecise conversion factor (I beleive the actual conversion factor is an irrational number), and (b) rounded poorly.

    --Mike



    Or, just maybe, he was converting into a standard ton.  By definition 2000 lbs = 1 ton.  Using his math, 1999.9997795 lbs = 1 ton.  That is a heck of a lot closer than the 10% error to your theory.


    There are a variety of units known as a "ton".  There's the short ton of 2000lb (used in the USA, and called simply "ton" there,) the long ton of 2240lb (used in the UK, and known simply as a "ton" here,) and the tonne of 1000kg (metric, ~2204lb.)
    There are also a few other units called "ton", see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ton
  • (cs) in reply to RevMike

    This all reminds me of a program I was reading that converted seconds to "shakes of a lamb's tail" to do animation.

    Apparently, the standard shake of a lambs tail is 1/10th of a second.

  • (cs) in reply to RageingNonsense
    Alex Papadimoulis:

    public static decimal PoundsToTons(decimal pounds)
    {
      decimal poundFactor = 0.4535924m;
      decimal tonFactor = 907.1847m;
      return Decimal.Divide((Decimal.Multiply(pounds, poundFactor)), tonFactor);
    }

    Anonymous:
    What intrigues me is the little "m"'s at the ends of the numbers. Unless this is a code construct I am not familiar with, I'd love to see what role it plays.


    I was confused by those m's as well.  They have to be a language feature.  What language is this code in? C# maybe?  Looks kinda like Java but Java doesn't have a "decimal" type.

    Maybe someone could enlighten us about these m's ??


    Sincerely,
    Neil Armstrong
  • just a guy (unregistered) in reply to James R. Carr

    More exactly is:
    "The real WTF here is that people from <font size="5">USA</font> still don't use the metric system."

    the rest of the americans(yeah the american continent start in alaska and end in the patagonia): mexicans, cubans, peruvian, chilenian, etc use it !

  • (cs) in reply to AJR
    AJR:

    There are a variety of units known as a "ton".  There's the short ton of 2000lb (used in the USA, and called simply "ton" there,) the long ton of 2240lb (used in the UK, and known simply as a "ton" here,) and the tonne of 1000kg (metric, ~2204lb.)
    There are also a few other units called "ton", see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ton


    Yes.  There is the correct unit, and the evil imposters.
  • (cs) in reply to just a guy
    Anonymous:
    More exactly is:
    "The real WTF here is that people from <font size="5">USA</font> still don't use the metric system."

    the rest of the americans(yeah the american continent start in alaska and end in the patagonia): mexicans, cubans, peruvian, chilenian, etc use it !


    They don't count.
  • (cs) in reply to just a guy
    Anonymous:
    More exactly is:
    "The real WTF here is that people from <font size="5">USA</font> still don't use the metric system."

    the rest of the americans(yeah the american continent start in alaska and end in the patagonia): mexicans, cubans, peruvian, chilenian, etc use it !


    So sad.  Every year thousands of USA-nian children are forced to learn an obsolete system of measurement, which isolates them from the rest of the civilized world, all so that Detroit doesn't have to retool its factories.
  • (cs) in reply to Otac0n
    Otac0n:

    This all reminds me of a program I was reading that converted seconds to "shakes of a lamb's tail" to do animation.

    Apparently, the standard shake of a lambs tail is 1/10th of a second.



    There are some VMS tools that accept fortnights as interval units.
  • (cs)

    You haul 16.0000017637 tons, and whaddayaget

    (yes, I did compute it based on those factors)

  • Bologna (unregistered) in reply to kipthegreat

    the 'm' is for metric.  as in, "have you met rick?  he's the moron who coded this shit."

  • (cs) in reply to kipthegreat

    The "m"s are just to declare the literals as decimals, as opposed to integers or doubles.  (sort of like "f" for float, "ul" for unsigned long, etc.. in C/C++)

  • bj (unregistered) in reply to RevMike

    just drop the last 7 from the tonFactor (907.184 instead of 907.1847) - then the conversion works perfectly for non-metric tons. w00t.

  • warren (unregistered) in reply to RevMike
    RevMike:
    Anonymous:
    The real WTF here is that Americans still don't use the metric system.        


    No, the real WTF is that the rest of the world has been duped into using that inferior system.


    Here you have it folks, today's WTF.
  • yep (unregistered) in reply to Maurits

    <FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fffbf0">USA *is* the civilized world.</FONT>

  • (cs) in reply to RevMike
    RevMike:
    AJR:

    There are a variety of units known as a "ton".  There's the short ton of 2000lb (used in the USA, and called simply "ton" there,) the long ton of 2240lb (used in the UK, and known simply as a "ton" here,) and the tonne of 1000kg (metric, ~2204lb.)
    There are also a few other units called "ton", see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ton


    Yes.  There is the correct unit, and the evil imposters.

    And which one is the correct unit is left as a cause of flame wars an exercise to the reader. ;)
  • (cs) in reply to Maurits
    Maurits:
    Anonymous:
    More exactly is:
    "The real WTF here is that people from <font size="5">USA</font> still don't use the metric system."

    the rest of the americans(yeah the american continent start in alaska and end in the patagonia): mexicans, cubans, peruvian, chilenian, etc use it !


    So sad.  Every year thousands of USA-nian children are forced to learn an obsolete system of measurement, which isolates them from the rest of the civilized world, all so that Detroit doesn't have to retool its factories.


    Hrm, I think I would rather keep using the numbers like 5280, 1.54, (9/5)+32, 12, 3, 2000, 220<font size="3">0, </font><font style="font-family: times new roman;" size="3">3.785 </font><font size="3">etc</font>, than by factors of 10.  See - the metric system just doesn't make sense to me.  It sounds WAY too complicated, give me the standard system any day.
    .jc
  • (cs) in reply to Maurits

    Maurits:
    Anonymous:
    More exactly is:
    "The real WTF here is that people from <FONT size=5>USA</FONT> still don't use the metric system."

    the rest of the americans(yeah the american continent start in alaska and end in the patagonia): mexicans, cubans, peruvian, chilenian, etc use it !


    So sad.  Every year thousands of USA-nian children are forced to learn an obsolete system of measurement, which isolates them from the rest of the civilized world, all so that Detroit doesn't have to retool its factories.

    Huh?  Last time I looked by socket set has metric and 'standard'.  That's not the reason.  Even if it were, Detroit won't have any factories soon.

    The problem is that old people don't want to have to learn a new system.

    Also, not all tons are equal.  Some tons are heavier than others.

  • LeoPetr (unregistered) in reply to Eyrie Owl

    I did. There are 1000 kilograms in a real ton.;)

  • (cs) in reply to kipthegreat

    from vs online help:

    Literals
    If you want a numeric real literal to be treated as decimal, use the suffix m or M, for example:

    decimal myMoney = 300.5m;
    Without the suffix m, the number is treated as a double, thus generating a compiler error.

  • (cs)

    I dunno, as WTFs go, the real question is why a country that has no use for the regency continues to use an ambigious, arbitrary measurement system that is BASED on the regency's body (and varied from regency to regency).

    It is almost as if they MISSED having royalty.  Tell ya what! We've had plenty of that up here in Canada, and we can afford to be generous.  You can have our Queen in our place.  Heck, we'll even throw in the governer general who THINKS she's the queen (of what, we are not quite sure, since she's clearly an anti-queen seperatist who comes from a cuture that KILLED all their regents in the past few hundered years, no matter what the liberals were forced to lie about after they got caught blindsided by the whole affair).

    In fact, you can even have Adrien Clarkson... Her delusions that she's the queen from her time as the governer general are so strong that they probably still persist.

    Geeze, that's some threat!  Go metric or we'll send in the queen!

  • (cs)

    > and disabled rounding for debugging purposes.

    WTF?

    Explain.  Both 'how?' and, well, 'why?'

  • (cs) in reply to rogthefrog

    rogthefrog:
    You haul 16.0000017637 tons, and whaddayaget

    (yes, I did compute it based on those factors)

     

    lol... older w/ more debt!

  • (cs) in reply to Maurits
    Maurits:
    Anonymous:
    More exactly is:
    "The real WTF here is that people from <font size="5">USA</font> still don't use the metric system."

    the rest of the americans(yeah the american continent start in alaska and end in the patagonia): mexicans, cubans, peruvian, chilenian, etc use it !


    So sad.  Every year thousands of USA-nian children are forced to learn an obsolete system of measurement, which isolates them from the rest of the civilized world, all so that Detroit doesn't have to retool its factories.


    The metric system was created by the French revolutionary government while they executed tens of thousands.  The metric system was used by the Nazis during the holocaust, the Bolshevicks during their purges, and the Chinese during the Culteral Revolution.

    Is this a coincidence?  The metric system demands absolute conformity from its weights and measures.  Measures that do not conform are ruthlessly eliminated.  These authoritarian regimes demand absolute conformity from the people under their yolk, ruthlessly eliminating any who would not conform.

    I, for one, am glad to live in a land where fractions of inches are measured in sixteenths, 12 inches make up a foot, and 3 feet make a yard.  Give me furlongs and acre-feet.  Give me rods and chains.  Give me ounces, both dry and fluid.  But give me liberty.  When my units are free I can be free.

    And those in that again dark continent...  I'll keep a candle lit for you that you will eventually throw of the yoke of your new masters in Brussells.  Today you conform in currency.  You are growing in legal conformity.  Soon they will come to make you conform in all ways, at risk of your very life.
  • (cs) in reply to LeoPetr
    LeoPetr:
    I did. There are 1000 kilograms in a real ton.;)


    Hey, Leo.  Glad you could join us from the Peoples' Republic of Canuckistan.  :)
  • (cs) in reply to kipthegreat
    kipthegreat:
    Alex Papadimoulis:

    public static decimal PoundsToTons(decimal pounds)
    {
      decimal poundFactor = 0.4535924m;
      decimal tonFactor = 907.1847m;
      return Decimal.Divide((Decimal.Multiply(pounds, poundFactor)), tonFactor);
    }


    Anonymous:
    What intrigues me is the little "m"'s at the ends of the numbers. Unless this is a code construct I am not familiar with, I'd love to see what role it plays.


    I was confused by those m's as well.  They have to be a language feature.  What language is this code in? C# maybe?  Looks kinda like Java but Java doesn't have a "decimal" type.

    Maybe someone could enlighten us about these m's ??


    Sincerely,
    Neil Armstrong

    The ms are for decimal literals.

  • (cs) in reply to dabocla
    dabocla:
    Maurits:
    Anonymous:
    More exactly is:
    "The real WTF here is that people from <font size="5">USA</font> still don't use the metric system."

    the rest of the americans(yeah the american continent start in alaska and end in the patagonia): mexicans, cubans, peruvian, chilenian, etc use it !


    So sad.  Every year thousands of USA-nian children are forced to learn an obsolete system of measurement, which isolates them from the rest of the civilized world, all so that Detroit doesn't have to retool its factories.


    Hrm, I think I would rather keep using the numbers like 5280, 1.54, (9/5)+32, 12, 3, 2000, 220<font size="3">0, </font><font style="font-family: times new roman;" size="3">3.785 </font><font size="3">etc</font>, than by factors of 10.  See - the metric system just doesn't make sense to me.  It sounds WAY too complicated, give me the standard system any day.
    .jc

    Ok, everyone can use anything they like, even if it makes you crash satellites, but why would they call it standard? there is nothing standard in it. Are they trying to mock it?
  • (cs) in reply to RevMike
    RevMike:
    Otac0n:

    This all reminds me of a program I was reading that converted seconds to "shakes of a lamb's tail" to do animation.

    Apparently, the standard shake of a lambs tail is 1/10th of a second.



    There are some VMS tools that accept fortnights as interval units.


    I come for the wisdom, I stay for the trivia, and I won't leave for a buck.
  • DS (unregistered) in reply to RevMike

    >> Today you conform in currency.

    ROFLOL!!
    Go ahead and check $ / € exchange rates and see tendency for yourself...

    LP,
    Dejan




  • rhett (unregistered) in reply to Eyrie Owl

    Anonymous:
    please tell me no one needed the link to the answer....

    I did.  Similar to how I would need to look up what a cubit or stadia was.

  • Bob (unregistered) in reply to just a guy

    well i am a citizen, born and raised in the US of A and I proudly use metric system, soley.  If I am asked my weight, Ill give it in kg, i am asked the outside temp, ill say it in C.  US changed into metric long ago, legally speaking.  I am just using it and not my fault americans are too lazy to use a superior measurment system bc to them its tradition.  no wonder why the rest of the world hates us.    

  • Paul Tomblin (unregistered) in reply to Maurits
    Maurits:

    So sad.  Every year thousands of USA-nian children are forced to learn an obsolete system of measurement, which isolates them from the rest of the civilized world, all so that Detroit doesn't have to retool its factories.


    Factories?  In the USA?  Don't be silly, they've outsourced all that stuff to China.  All they make in the USA these days are brand names and hype.
  • (cs) in reply to DS
    Anonymous:
    >> Today you conform in currency.

    ROFLOL!!
    Go ahead and check $ / € exchange rates and see tendency for yourself...

    LP,
    Dejan


    Now compare unemployment rates, growth rates, etc.  Please tell me why I shouldn't be laughing.
  • (cs) in reply to James R. Carr
    Anonymous:
    The real WTF here is that Americans still don't use the metric system.        


    LOL. Tell me about it. I always have to stop and think, now how many inches are in a foot? And how many ounces in a pound again? I love the metric system. Just multiply or divide by 10 to move up or down the scale. ;)

    The real problem is that 90% of our stuff is still mass-produced in the old English system. It would cost so much to convert everything over that there would be no real value gained. ^o) We should have made the switch 100 years ago when it wouldn't have cost so much.
  • (cs) in reply to Bob
    Anonymous:
    well i am a citizen, born and raised in the US of A and I proudly use metric system, soley.  If I am asked my weight, Ill give it in kg, i am asked the outside temp, ill say it in C.  US changed into metric long ago, legally speaking.  I am just using it and not my fault americans are too lazy to use a superior measurment system bc to them its tradition.  no wonder why the rest of the world hates us.    


    Fascist!!  Why Don't You Move to Canada!!
  • (cs) in reply to RevMike

    RevMike:
    Maurits:
    Anonymous:
    More exactly is:
    "The real WTF here is that people from <FONT size=5>USA</FONT> still don't use the metric system."

    the rest of the americans(yeah the american continent start in alaska and end in the patagonia): mexicans, cubans, peruvian, chilenian, etc use it !


    So sad.  Every year thousands of USA-nian children are forced to learn an obsolete system of measurement, which isolates them from the rest of the civilized world, all so that Detroit doesn't have to retool its factories.


    The metric system was created by the French revolutionary government while they executed tens of thousands.  The metric system was used by the Nazis during the holocaust, the Bolshevicks during their purges, and the Chinese during the Culteral Revolution.

    Is this a coincidence?  The metric system demands absolute conformity from its weights and measures.  Measures that do not conform are ruthlessly eliminated.  These authoritarian regimes demand absolute conformity from the people under their yolk, ruthlessly eliminating any who would not conform.

    I, for one, am glad to live in a land where fractions of inches are measured in sixteenths, 12 inches make up a foot, and 3 feet make a yard.  Give me furlongs and acre-feet.  Give me rods and chains.  Give me ounces, both dry and fluid.  But give me liberty.  When my units are free I can be free.

    And those in that again dark continent...  I'll keep a candle lit for you that you will eventually throw of the yoke of your new masters in Brussells.  Today you conform in currency.  You are growing in legal conformity.  Soon they will come to make you conform in all ways, at risk of your very life.

     

    I was part of the first set of students that were taught the metric system because the Canadian government decided to drop the Imperial System, the system created and forced upon by the British Monarchy, the same Monarchy that you Americans fought to achieve freedom from.  Hmmm, yet you continue to use the antiquated system they forced upon most the the world they ruled, yet most of those countries upon leaving the commonwealth chose to move to the Metric system.  So who is it that choses freedom?  I think if you leave aside your patriotic rhetoric you would actually see the significance of using the Metric system.

     

     

  • (cs) in reply to dubwai
    dubwai:

    Maurits:
    Anonymous:
    More exactly is:
    "The real WTF here is that people from <font size="5">USA</font> still don't use the metric system."

    the rest of the americans(yeah the american continent start in alaska and end in the patagonia): mexicans, cubans, peruvian, chilenian, etc use it !


    So sad.  Every year thousands of USA-nian children are forced to learn an obsolete system of measurement, which isolates them from the rest of the civilized world, all so that Detroit doesn't have to retool its factories.

    Huh?  Last time I looked by socket set has metric and 'standard'.  That's not the reason.  Even if it were, Detroit won't have any factories soon.

    The problem is that old people don't want to have to learn a new system.

    Also, not all tons are equal.  Some tons are heavier than others.



    I believe the term for wrenches, sockets, etc. is SAE.  At least I'm 14mm sure. Now there is an interesting question - what IS our system called?

    On the subject of software design: I wonder what his function for conversion from feet to miles looks like...  And if the programmer would have taken a nautical mile or a statute mile...

Leave a comment on “The 2,000 Pound Question”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

Log Out

« Return to Article