- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
-
Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
Those look like bold+underline, which just looks like emphasis, not links. Links are a different color so you can see them. See: link. They're not even always underlined, but they're still a different color: link.
Granted, they're exactly the same style as all the other links on the page...
Admin
:giggity:
Admin
They're clearly distinguishable from the surrounding text. There could be more done to make them look like links but honestly, these days, color or underline (but not both) is pretty normal.
Admin
Alas, Javascript doesn't like
[image]8=>({})...I can ask my wife about the parentheses thing, but I doubt it'll help.
Admin
Well it wasn't obvious for me and I am a web developer!
Admin
Niiiice.
<!-- 87c69ccc-3c6f-47d3-8c66-4f3fdb9def26 -->Admin
That's not our fault.
Only if it involves CSS on IDs
Admin
To be fair, most pure front end developers I have been working with (I haven't worked with them before) are looking at IDs in CSS as a the rightful plague that they are.
There is no need, there is no excuse and it is almost as bad as littering your stylesheets with important! because you don't know what you are doing.
But all of you guys are "proper developers" and know everything about maintainable style-sheets, bleeding of styles, CSS selector speed (yes it does matter) ... don't you?