Wolferitza sends us a large chunk of a C# class. We'll take it in chunks because there's a lot here, but let's start with the obvious problem:

    private int iID0;
    private int iID1;
    private int iID2;
    private int iID3;
    private int iID4;
    private int iID5;
    private int iID6;
    private int iID7;
    private int iID8;
    private int iID9;
    private int iID10;
    private int iID11;
    private int iID12;
    private int iID13;

Handling non-existent values always presents special challenges. We've (mostly) agreed that NULL is, in some fashion, the right way to do it, though it's still common to see some sort of sentinel value that exists outside of the expected range- like a function returning a negative value when an error occurred, and a zero (or positive) value when the operation completes.

Javier found this function, which has a… very French(?) way of handling invalid dates.

Alicia recently moved to a new country and took a job with a small company willing to pay well and help with relocation costs. Overall, the code base was pretty solid. Despite the overall strong code base, one recurring complaint was that running the test suite was painfully long.

While Alicia doesn't specify what the core business is, but says: "in this company's core business, random numbers were the base of everything."

Brian (previously)found himself contracting for an IoT company, shipping thermostats and other home automation tools, along with mobile apps to control them.

Brian was hired because the previous contractor had hung around long enough for the product to launch, cashed the check, and vanished, never to be heard from again.