• (cs) in reply to Macgyver

    Some of the managers I've worked for frequently make ridiculous demands like that. I usually just chalk it up to a brain-fart from a manager who takes on too much and can't keep track of anything.

    If, on the other hand, the manager tries to hold/blame me on their own stupidity, I just yes-them to death while making finding a new position job-one.

    -- Never argue with an idiot - people might not know who is who

  • Tom (unregistered) in reply to Abscissa

    If you think smart people can't be sloppy typists, you haven't worked around engineers much.

  • Dustin (unregistered)

    My question for the manager:

    If I give you the results on Friday, why do we bother sending out the email next week at all?

  • (cs)

    I was never a member of MENSA, but for about a year I was a member of an even higher-IQ society. There are three or for of them. Depending on the society, you have to be in the top .1% or .01% or four or five standard deviations above the norm. Usually the name reflects that requirement in some obscure way. They look down on MENSA as a place for people who had to take 17 or 18 different IQ tests until they got in. The society I belonged to had a monthly journal. The typical journal article was written by someone with no background in whatever he was writing about (but SMART! so he could see things experts couldn't!) suggesting a new line of inquiry the experts should investigate thoroughly and then thank him for. (What if the universe really were a finite sphere but it appeared infinite because the farther away you get from the center, the smaller you get? So that the edge of the sphere is actually the limit? You probably don't understand limits so I'll explain them to you in the next fourteen paragraphs. So you see, you'd never actually reach the edge because you keep getting smaller so you think it's infinite. I have all the math in my head but I don't feel like writing it down, but it's all in what I just said so I freely give it to whatever physicist wants to be the next Einstein. Fame and fortune aren't for me.) Every society needs a constitution, so the leaders solicited sample constitutions from the membership. Many readers wrote up constitutions. An article on "anomalies in voting systems" had just appeared in Scientific American (for example, Fred, Dave and Bill are running; 60% would rather have Dave or Bill than Fred but Fred wins 40 to 30 to 30), so each constitution had three or four paragraphs of the usual constitution stuff followed by a voting procedure several pages long. For the rest of the year until my membership lapsed, the letters to the editor were arguments about voting systems.

  • res2 (unregistered) in reply to not so sure
    not so sure:
    Steamer2k:
    After a while, you learn not to fight the stupidity (a fight you cannot win), but just to let them learn from their own mistakes and CYA in the meantime.

    Do not answer a fool according to his folly, Or you will also be like him. --Proverbs 26:24

    Answer a fool as his folly deserves, That he not be wise in his own eyes. --Proverbs 26:25

    This statement is a lie!

    Actually its Proverbs 26:4-5...

  • tec (unregistered) in reply to dbs

    I agree with your premise that communication is the responsibility of both parties; however, that responsibility doesn't need to be shared evenly and in some cases one party may so confound the other that communication is impossible.

    Case in point: I once generated some online graphs showing all of our various data in different levels of detail. All was great with daily, monthly, and yearly graphs. When it came time to dealing with quarterly graphs, we had a massive miscommunication that I must sadly admit I was unable to overcome.

    My customer insisted that the graphs were exactly what she wanted, except the quarterly graphs were wrong because (in this particular case) I was dividing yearly data by four and not five.

    For hours I tried to explain there are four quarters in a year in much the same way there are four quarters in a dollar. In hopes of trying to find some common ground, I asked her to show me the five quarters. She began that January 1st was the beginning of a quarter, April 1st was the beginning of the second quarter, July 1st was the beginning of the 3rd quarter, October 1st was the beginning of the 4th quarter, and because you had to end it, December 31 was then end of the quarter. Logically, since she clearly pointed out five (not four) dates, then the data must be divided by five.

    At some point I yielded saying I would generate a graph that divides the data by five, but I refuse to label it "Quarterly" because that simply is not correct.

    At this point I believe she started yelling and I think there was some crying involved.

    I accept the issue is my fault because I was unable to communicate reality in a clear and understandable manner. So what do you do when logic, reason, analogy, pictures, and math fail?

  • Zylon (unregistered) in reply to res2
    res2:
    not so sure:
    Steamer2k:
    After a while, you learn not to fight the stupidity (a fight you cannot win), but just to let them learn from their own mistakes and CYA in the meantime.

    Do not answer a fool according to his folly, Or you will also be like him. --Proverbs 26:24

    Answer a fool as his folly deserves, That he not be wise in his own eyes. --Proverbs 26:25

    This statement is a lie!

    Actually its Proverbs 26:4-5...

    So it's a quote from the Bible. PoTAYto, poTAHto.

  • Mithras (unregistered) in reply to Romeo
    Romeo:
    The real WTF is that he didn't send the results. They should be like this:

    Survey Results

    Option A - 0% Option B - 0% Option C - 0% Option D - 0%

    And so on...

    I'm sure MENSA people should be satisfied with that.

    Hmmm, but wouldn't the denominator also be 0? And 0/0 is indeterminate, so it'd be more like Option A - NaN% Option B - NaN% Option C - NaN% Option D - NaN%

    which would be befittinfly WTFish anyway...

  • Who (unregistered) in reply to Jimmy Jones
    Jimmy Jones:
    Lady Nocturne:
    In Spanish, "mensa" means stupid.

    FWIW.

    No it doesn't.

    The word "mensa" doesn't exist in Spanish. The closest word I can think of is "menta" (which means "mint").

    Wow, GOOGLE needs you! Better head on over to translate (Spanish to English), type in "mensa", and watch the result, stupid.

    Not you. The result is "stupid". Maybe many Google employees have an issue with MENSA - probably taken in by AMWAY/QUIXTAR as well?

  • (cs) in reply to Dustin
    1. Enough with the polluting of the threads with "what does ____ mean?" Jeez, it's called Google people, if you don't know, look it up.... Be self-sufficient for a change.

    2. This story is either complete crap, or we're reading a very one-sided opinion of it. My seven year old can clearly understand you can't have answers before you ask questions. If the PM couldn't understand this, then the Boss should have, and....

    3. So this guy just accepts this crap? Ok, so we're in bizarro world where the PM and the boss don't understand you get answers only after the questions are asked; so you work up the food chain people. The boss' boss, or that boss' boss will understand, and if not then clearly Martin is not in sufficient command of the spoken language to convey his thoughts on the matter....

    And now back to your regularly scheduled "is this Java or C#?" subject matter....

    -Me

  • eight days a week (unregistered) in reply to Joe Sloe
    Joe Sloe:
    The Conversation probably went like so:

    M: But you do realize, that I cannot get you the results you are looking for. Because You want the results Friday, however you want to mail out the invitations to employees Monday... Today is Thursday.
    PM: Yes, exactly, so why can't you do this? MARKLAR M: Because, I cannot bend time. PM: Oh... MARKLAR, well then MARKLAR, I need you do figure something out. MARKLAR M: Ok, then let me get back to work and finish making this survey, and on Monday 'Like you said' I'll send out the invites to the employees. PM: I need the results by Friday. M: Tomorrow? PM: Friday. M: Next Friday or tomorrow? PM: FRIDAY, what do you not understand about the word Friday. Gawd, you are stupid. MARKLAR M: I understand Friday, but if it is tomorrow, then it is impossible. Because the invites won't be sent out until AFTER FRIDAY!. PM: MARKLAR MARKLAR MARKLAR MARKLAR MARKLAR. M: Fuck it I quit.

    That's better.

  • (cs)
    ...He got an email from his boss (the 5th that he'd had in nine months) requesting that Martin see him in his office...

    Martin was later written up for "failure to perform other duties as required." Feeling that he wasn't a good fit for the company, citing that as a human he's bound by the laws of space-time, he left for a much better opportunity.

    I think this result is what management was after in this case. It reminds me of when I was in college and working at a grocery store. Most of the employees were poverty-level income (~$5.00/hour) and either single mothers, or supplementing the paycheck of a low-income spouse. Hours of work were all-important. Whenever someone got sideways with the manager, he would cut back their hours for a few weeks. And when he decided to get rid of someone he didn't like, he didn't fire them. He cut them back to something like 13 hours per week, forcing them to find work somewhere else, where they could make more than fifty bucks a week.

    Sounds like Martin got sideways with his management, and they jockeyed him into position to quit in a very similar manner. Not so stupid, after all.

  • Rafael Larios (unregistered) in reply to tec
    tec:
    So what do you do when logic, reason, analogy, pictures, and math fail?

    Start taking LSD?

  • Typical (unregistered) in reply to marvin_rabbit
    marvin_rabbit:
    Couldn't Martin just press the "Easy" button?

    Depends on the country. Everyone in the world has not seen the "Easy" button commercials. Perhaps they have an "Easy" sledge hammer?

  • Franz Kafka (unregistered) in reply to bad boss
    bad boss:
    I had an unethical boss explain that sort of behaviour to me some years ago.

    Make up impossible tasks in order to get rid of an employee you don't like.

    Why not just fire them? They'll get unemployment anyway.

  • amazedReader (unregistered) in reply to daRover
    daRover:
    Sorry. I just can't believe this one. Either we're not getting the whole story or this is complete fiction.
    1. Someone would have been happy with fabricated results

    2. Someone was doing CYA at the programmers expense (so what is new about that). Probably the requester got confused about which Friday the survey results were promised, and was too much of a coward to step up and take the blame.

    3. Deliberate attempt to set up the programmer.

    I incline toward #2, though #3 is certainly possible. So is #1, but least likely.

  • Zylon (unregistered) in reply to Mithras
    Mithras:
    Hmmm, but wouldn't the denominator also be 0? And 0/0 is indeterminate, so it'd be more like Option A - NaN% Option B - NaN% Option C - NaN% Option D - NaN%

    which would be befittinfly WTFish anyway...

    NaN == 0, for sufficiently small values of NaN.
  • (cs) in reply to daRover
    daRover:
    Sorry. I just can't believe this one. Either we're not getting the whole story or this is complete fiction.

    I believe it. I've had similar requests for the impossible come by.

    Back when I was working as a technician at a mechanical testing lab, we once had three large testing jobs come in at the same time. Each job would take the full capacity of the lab for five days, each job was rush priority, and each job had a deadline of five days in the future. When the engineer in charge of the jobs was asked which job was most important so we could prioritize, he said "all of them".

    As requested, we did all three jobs at the same time, with all three jobs having top priority. The results for all three jobs landed on the engineer's desk twelve days after the deadline. There was a great deal of shit kicked up over that stunt, but since the entire department was in on it, and the department was indirectly responsible for 40% of the company's income, there wasn't much anyone could do.

  • (cs) in reply to Rafael Larios
    Rafael Larios:
    tec:
    So what do you do when logic, reason, analogy, pictures, and math fail?

    Start taking LSD?

    It's not when they fail... it's when they've fallen sloppy dead.

    Slick, yet Graceful.

  • (cs) in reply to tec
    tec:
    I agree with your premise that communication is the responsibility of both parties; however, that responsibility doesn't need to be shared evenly and in some cases one party may so confound the other that communication is impossible.

    Case in point: I once generated some online graphs showing all of our various data in different levels of detail. All was great with daily, monthly, and yearly graphs. When it came time to dealing with quarterly graphs, we had a massive miscommunication that I must sadly admit I was unable to overcome.

    My customer insisted that the graphs were exactly what she wanted, except the quarterly graphs were wrong because (in this particular case) I was dividing yearly data by four and not five.

    For hours I tried to explain there are four quarters in a year in much the same way there are four quarters in a dollar. In hopes of trying to find some common ground, I asked her to show me the five quarters. She began that January 1st was the beginning of a quarter, April 1st was the beginning of the second quarter, July 1st was the beginning of the 3rd quarter, October 1st was the beginning of the 4th quarter, and because you had to end it, December 31 was then end of the quarter. Logically, since she clearly pointed out five (not four) dates, then the data must be divided by five.

    At some point I yielded saying I would generate a graph that divides the data by five, but I refuse to label it "Quarterly" because that simply is not correct.

    At this point I believe she started yelling and I think there was some crying involved.

    I accept the issue is my fault because I was unable to communicate reality in a clear and understandable manner. So what do you do when logic, reason, analogy, pictures, and math fail?

    Same thing you do to resolve a difficult programming problem: when one approach is failing take a new approach.

    Also LISTEN, what is the other person saying to you (something we don't get at all in this WTF). In your case the other person is hung up on the five dates (four starting dates, and one end date), but you could have pointed out there are actually eight dates, the four starting dates, and the four ending dates. Then draw out those dates on a map of the year, block out the sections, label them 1, 2, 3, 4 and ask her where the "fifth" quarter is....

    Would that specific example work? Who knows, but it would have prompted her to say more about what she thinks, then you turn that around again....

    This is why technical degrees should include more time in English (or whatever language) courses. I don't really care if you can code an OS from scratch with a rusty nail, if you can't explain to a non-technical person why it's worth doing then there's no point in doing it, and you certainly won't get funding for it.

    Being an uber-geek is all fine, but it will only take you so far. Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Larry Page and Sergey Brin all were techies, but they also could convey their ideas in way that was understandable to a layman. Technical prowess without that is the true WTF....

    -Me

  • Me (unregistered) in reply to Carnildo
    Carnildo:
    daRover:
    Sorry. I just can't believe this one. Either we're not getting the whole story or this is complete fiction.

    I believe it. I've had similar requests for the impossible come by.

    Back when I was working as a technician at a mechanical testing lab, we once had three large testing jobs come in at the same time. Each job would take the full capacity of the lab for five days, each job was rush priority, and each job had a deadline of five days in the future. When the engineer in charge of the jobs was asked which job was most important so we could prioritize, he said "all of them".

    As requested, we did all three jobs at the same time, with all three jobs having top priority. The results for all three jobs landed on the engineer's desk twelve days after the deadline. There was a great deal of shit kicked up over that stunt, but since the entire department was in on it, and the department was indirectly responsible for 40% of the company's income, there wasn't much anyone could do.

    Ok, it's not uncommon,

    Not understanding the linearity of time IS uncommon, and here we have at least two people who don't ...

  • xavi (unregistered) in reply to Jimmy Jones
    Jimmy Jones:
    Lady Nocturne:
    In Spanish, "mensa" means stupid.

    FWIW.

    No it doesn't.

    The word "mensa" doesn't exist in Spanish. The closest word I can think of is "menta" (which means "mint").

    'mensa' would be the fem. form of 'menso' which loosely translates to 'stupid' or 'fool'. These words are (almost) never used but they do exist.
  • (cs)

    This reminds me of a minor WTF I had once. Paraphrased as follows:

    invitation: project kickoff meeting today 11am kickoff meeting: welcome yada yada awesome project you're all great, here's the schedule, lets get going! me: Is this schedule current? her: Yes, updated it today me: This shows here I started my first task January 1st her: (looking) yes that's correct. me: That's a holiday her: well I just used that as my starting day. Project adjusts for holidays. me: Ok, but do you realize that is also over 2 weeks in the PAST? That that means I'm already 2 weeks behind? her: ... me: Please either adjust the schedule or let me know so I can file a change control showing I'm already 2 weeks late.

    I can procrastinate on my own, thank you very much.

  • Me (unregistered) in reply to xavi
    xavi:
    Jimmy Jones:
    Lady Nocturne:
    In Spanish, "mensa" means stupid.

    FWIW.

    No it doesn't.

    The word "mensa" doesn't exist in Spanish. The closest word I can think of is "menta" (which means "mint").

    'mensa' would be the fem. form of 'menso' which loosely translates to 'stupid' or 'fool'. These words are (almost) never used but they do exist.

    Could we have a few more comments, stating that the word 'mensa /menso' does exist in the Spanish language, please? I am almost believing it does.

  • (cs)

    As a side comment, for everyone talking about English courses, they do little to teach Communication skills. IMHO everybody, from Management to Technology should probably go to a "how to communicate" course. Not that it'll ever happen.

  • anonymous (unregistered) in reply to Me
    Me:
    Could we have a few more comments, stating that the word 'mensa /menso' does exist in the Spanish language, please? I am almost believing it does.

    yeah, sure. You can look on a dictionary http://rae2.es/menso

  • LoveGoblin (unregistered) in reply to Anonymous Mensa-Member

    And therefore, more of them!

  • (cs) in reply to res2
    res2:
    not so sure:
    Steamer2k:
    After a while, you learn not to fight the stupidity (a fight you cannot win), but just to let them learn from their own mistakes and CYA in the meantime.

    Do not answer a fool according to his folly, Or you will also be like him. --Proverbs 26:24

    Answer a fool as his folly deserves, That he not be wise in his own eyes. --Proverbs 26:25

    This statement is a lie!

    Actually its Proverbs 26:4-5...

    He must be using a base 13 Bible.

  • ContractorInLivingHell (unregistered)

    Hmm, is it possible that what was really going on here was that they wanted Martin to falsify the results in a way that the client would find favorable, all without asking him to do so? Sort of like "Who will rid me of this turbulent priest!?" as a means of giving the guards orders without actually doing so.

    Just a stab in the dark here... I am more inclined to think the people he worked for were just plain stupid, MENSA or not.

  • CynicalTyler (unregistered) in reply to BAH
    BAH:
    This is perfectly in keeping with management as I know it. "I sold the customer a structural analysis of his application by later today for $1000. He gave me this two-sentence verbal description of the system." "It takes at least two weeks and source code, and we usually charge at least $10K. There's a lot of work involved, that's why the reports are usually 20 to 50 pages." "The customer said he only wants to know if the application will fail or not. That's only one word. He doesn't need all the pages of report, and he was only willing to spend $1000. Let me know the answer by 4 o'clock."

    I could answer that in three words. "It will fail."

    captcha: pirates... yeah that pretty much sums up management types

  • NoneRightNow (unregistered)

    From http://www.wordreference.com/es/en/translation.asp?spen=mensa

    menso,-a m,f LAm fam pey dummy, jerk

    Yeah, that fits...

  • (cs) in reply to CynicalTyler

    The kind of people who think they can weasel their way out of explaining their stupidity by repeatedly pointing out "I'm in MENSA" are the main reason I don't go to the meetings... the other reason consists of people who think that having read and memorized "Robert's rules of order" is a substitute for actually having a point in a debate.

    But the membership looks good on a resume.

  • Zygo (unregistered) in reply to BAH
    BAH:
    This is perfectly in keeping with management as I know it. "I sold the customer a structural analysis of his application by later today for $1000. He gave me this two-sentence verbal description of the system." "It takes at least two weeks and source code, and we usually charge at least $10K. There's a lot of work involved, that's why the reports are usually 20 to 50 pages." "The customer said he only wants to know if the application will fail or not. That's only one word. He doesn't need all the pages of report, and he was only willing to spend $1000. Let me know the answer by 4 o'clock."

    The word is "yes" and it's about 1:30 PM in the Pacific time zone.

    I'll take a certified cheque, money order, or PayPal. Thanks.

  • Zygo (unregistered) in reply to Macgyver
    Macgyver:
    This is easy. Give them the results. I.E. A spreadsheet with no rows. None. Period. When they ask you for the results, you have the results.

    Unless it's an internal project, in which case you're an employee and can take the survey. Hopefully it's an employee satisfaction survey...

  • pnellesen (unregistered) in reply to stevekj
    stevekj:
    What Martin should have done, of course, is to explain to the PM that since the chain of events specified, consisting of the transmission of the notification of the survey, the completion of the survey by the surveyees, and the emailing of the final result, is causally related and therefore that each event is necessarily within the future light cone of the logically preceding event, or in other words that the events are separated by timelike intervals and not spacelike ones, therefore there is no frame of reference the PM could occupy in which the emailing of the final result could be observed to precede the initial notification of the survey.

    That would have cleared it up for sure.

    At least, the MENSA manager SURELY would have understood!

  • Zygo (unregistered) in reply to Mithras
    Mithras:
    Romeo:
    The real WTF is that he didn't send the results. They should be like this:

    Survey Results

    Option A - 0% Option B - 0% Option C - 0% Option D - 0%

    And so on...

    I'm sure MENSA people should be satisfied with that.

    Hmmm, but wouldn't the denominator also be 0? And 0/0 is indeterminate, so it'd be more like Option A - NaN% Option B - NaN% Option C - NaN% Option D - NaN%

    which would be befittinfly WTFish anyway...

    Option A - NULL% Option B - FALSE% Option C - TRUE% Option D - FILE_NOT_FOUND%

  • Da' Man (unregistered)

    I hate to tell you, but pretty much most market research is actually done this way.

    • "Oh, don't bother the results, we just write what the client wants to hear."

    Failure to work like is the "industry standard" clearly is a reason to fire the guy (just kidding ,-)

  • Jim (unregistered) in reply to newfweiler

    What was that club? Congress?

  • Spock (unregistered) in reply to CodeReaper

    He will build a time-machine, It will go back in time, He will be able to make everything turn out just right.

    He just hasn't done it yet.

  • Chris Preston (unregistered)

    I'd suggest some role playing. Like so:

    Programmer: Okay. I'm going to give you a question I want you to ask me. Before I do though, I want you to tell me what my answer will be. PS: How would I know that? Programmer: I don't know, but that is what you are asking of me. When you figure out how to do that, I'll be happy to implement it.

    Chances are at that point the PM would explain what they are REALLY after, and it probably fitsd reasonably well within the bounds of possibility.

  • (cs) in reply to BAH

    Wow.

    I once made $15,000 on retainer as an on-call third-line support for a fault-tolerant system, the net result of which was that I was called three times for a total of about an hour. I thought that was good money. You've just beaten it.

    What exactly is the problem here?

    You only have two choices. (Well, three, if you count File Not Found.) Under the circumstances, it's statistically certain that the application will fail. That's a 19 to 1 on bet in itself. Furthermore, if you say "it will succeed," you have to make sure it succeeds.

    The road to success is hard, painful and strewn with little pointy bits that get stuck between your toes. The road to failure is the road most chosen. Walt Whitman, I believe. Or was it Robert Frost?

    Anyway, easiest $1000 you'll ever earn. Suck it up ...

  • pointing out the obvious (unregistered) in reply to dbs

    "Sorry, this sounds like a basic miscommunication issue."

    I disagree. I think the concept of asking for the results before the survey has been taken is pretty basic. This is a problem that elementary school students would be able to grasp.

  • (cs) in reply to BAH
    BAH:
    This is perfectly in keeping with management as I know it. "I sold the customer a structural analysis of his application by later today for $1000. He gave me this two-sentence verbal description of the system." "It takes at least two weeks and source code, and we usually charge at least $10K. There's a lot of work involved, that's why the reports are usually 20 to 50 pages." "The customer said he only wants to know if the application will fail or not. That's only one word. He doesn't need all the pages of report, and he was only willing to spend $1000. Let me know the answer by 4 o'clock."
    Oops, sorry, couldn't quite bend space-time fast enough. The above was in reference to this quote.

    BTW, what exactly is the point of the "reply" button?

  • bpo (unregistered) in reply to Me
    Me:
    daRover:
    Sorry. I just can't believe this one. Either we're not getting the whole story or this is complete fiction.

    I totally agree.

    No person capable asking for a survey, or any management is that stupid.

    If the story has its base in reality, it has been anonymized to something that just don't make sense.

    you guys have seen the verizonmath stuff right? http://verizonmath.blogspot.com/

    NEVER underestimate the stupidity of anyone.

  • SeniorNonTechnicalPerson (unregistered) in reply to MensaMember
    MensaMember:
    Martin should have done the obvious, and given the PM person the results of the survey. The fact that zero people have taken the survey doesn't mean that there are no results.

    Absolutely and amen! Often (not always, but often), when a PM (or manager, for that matter) asks for something and they get ANY kind of resistence (even if it's an effort to explain why they are asking for the impossible), they focus on the resistence not the content.

  • (cs) in reply to Marc

    Unfortunately IQ score doesn't usually mean much.

    I disagree. Your IQ score is a very accurate measure of your ability to perform an IQ test.

    :)

  • (cs) in reply to LRB
    LRB:
    ...She didn't care as long as she got her "results" or she had someone to place blame on for not getting the results. In the corporate world it's more about knowing how to place blame on others than actually producing anything yourself.
    So the way Martin should've handled the problem is to blame the users for not completing the survey before it was put online. --Rank
  • (cs) in reply to tec
    tec:
    I agree with your premise that communication is the responsibility of both parties; however, that responsibility doesn't need to be shared evenly and in some cases one party may so confound the other that communication is impossible.

    Case in point: I once generated some online graphs showing all of our various data in different levels of detail. All was great with daily, monthly, and yearly graphs. When it came time to dealing with quarterly graphs, we had a massive miscommunication that I must sadly admit I was unable to overcome.

    My customer insisted that the graphs were exactly what she wanted, except the quarterly graphs were wrong because (in this particular case) I was dividing yearly data by four and not five.

    For hours I tried to explain there are four quarters in a year in much the same way there are four quarters in a dollar. In hopes of trying to find some common ground, I asked her to show me the five quarters. She began that January 1st was the beginning of a quarter, April 1st was the beginning of the second quarter, July 1st was the beginning of the 3rd quarter, October 1st was the beginning of the 4th quarter, and because you had to end it, December 31 was then end of the quarter. Logically, since she clearly pointed out five (not four) dates, then the data must be divided by five.

    At some point I yielded saying I would generate a graph that divides the data by five, but I refuse to label it "Quarterly" because that simply is not correct.

    At this point I believe she started yelling and I think there was some crying involved.

    I accept the issue is my fault because I was unable to communicate reality in a clear and understandable manner. So what do you do when logic, reason, analogy, pictures, and math fail?

    Maybe there was a long, sad story behind this. Apparently, she had no clear notion of intervals and interval limits. Many people get confused when they notice it the first time. But fact is, even a single interval has two limits. Sticking intervals together (and therefore melting two limits into one), you will always end up with one limit more than the number of intervals (as long as you don't connect them in a cyclic manner so that also the last two limits melt into one). She might have had a cyclic picture of the year in her head, but I would argue that a spiral approach is the correct one here. She might also have had fruitless discussions and problems with other people on this special topic earlier.

    Whereas this may be extremely trivial to most humans, there are always a few that don't get it. They didn't understand it in early childhood and continue to get stuck on it, for whatever reason. It may need some hours of concentrated work with her in a favourable environment for her to overcome this blockade.

    There is also an amazingly high number of analphabets among us, don't forget this! And, of course, it doesn't mean that these people aren't perfectly reasonable, intelligent and full of common sense in many other aspects.

    I believe that nothing is so trivial that there is not someone who just doesn't understand it.

  • ElSicilianoMaldito (unregistered) in reply to Jimmy Jones

    Yea, it exist, and its somethink like that...

    You can said: she is stupid -> "ella es una mensa", or he is stupid --> "el es un menso"

  • (cs) in reply to tec
    tec:
    I agree with your premise that communication is the responsibility of both parties; however, that responsibility doesn't need to be shared evenly and in some cases one party may so confound the other that communication is impossible.

    Case in point: I once generated some online graphs showing all of our various data in different levels of detail. All was great with daily, monthly, and yearly graphs. When it came time to dealing with quarterly graphs, we had a massive miscommunication that I must sadly admit I was unable to overcome.

    My customer insisted that the graphs were exactly what she wanted, except the quarterly graphs were wrong because (in this particular case) I was dividing yearly data by four and not five.

    For hours I tried to explain there are four quarters in a year in much the same way there are four quarters in a dollar. In hopes of trying to find some common ground, I asked her to show me the five quarters. She began that January 1st was the beginning of a quarter, April 1st was the beginning of the second quarter, July 1st was the beginning of the 3rd quarter, October 1st was the beginning of the 4th quarter, and because you had to end it, December 31 was then end of the quarter. Logically, since she clearly pointed out five (not four) dates, then the data must be divided by five.

    At some point I yielded saying I would generate a graph that divides the data by five, but I refuse to label it "Quarterly" because that simply is not correct.

    At this point I believe she started yelling and I think there was some crying involved.

    I accept the issue is my fault because I was unable to communicate reality in a clear and understandable manner. So what do you do when logic, reason, analogy, pictures, and math fail?

    Start laughing at her while she's crying and merrily saunter off, having destroyed a stupid person's day?

    See, what you may not realize is that regardless of how "correct" your perception of reality is, some people have this hard-headed streak about them that CANNOT - literally and in every sense of the word "CANNOT" - accept anyone else's well-described, very clear perception of reality.

    My wife worked with this guy who would tell her what the "law" was on a particular subject, and when she would look it up for herself, take him THE latest law (not case law, actual statutes) he would nicely avoid the truth until she quit bugging him about it. Thankfully she didn't work FOR him, but we're talking about two lawyers here. You would think a lawyer that's been practicing a LONG time would be able to understand simple statutes, but alas, he only believed what he wanted to believe, and no book or person could prove to him otherwise.

Leave a comment on “Ability to Bend Space-Time a Must”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article