• (cs)

    Excuse my lack of knowledge, but what is MENSA ? In england it's the group of sad and slightly suspicious muppets who think it impresses others to be 'certified as cleverer than you' when it doesn't...

  • anonymous (unregistered)

    People on this forum fail to "Think out of the box".

    If some people want tuesday something that will be ready monday. Maybe a word document. Send him a corrupt file, maybe bytes from /dev/random.

    The guy will reply "I can't open the file!". And you will ask that him send it to you. So you gain 1 day. Then you send another /dev/random snipper. The guy will fail again to open the file. That dawn Microsoft Word!.. Is crashing on his machine, while on mine works. Yer another day.

    [Mo] him: Imposible request [Tu] you: Send random as .doc him: request again [We] you: send random again as .doc him: request again [Thu] him: is corrupt again! you: no problem, I will use .rtf you: send .rtf will actual correct data [Fri] him: Ok, thanks! you: Nice, but you sould check your Word, seems bad

    Anyway I will not do that, because as most people here, I am naif.

  • timberwolf0122 (unregistered)

    I had this a few years a go. I was envolved with merger, it started to go wrong when the CRM systems merger deadline started to slip quite badly, unfortunately the Data Warehouse system I was working (that could not be late!) needed to pull data from the CRM system. Long story short the PM re-did the time in such a way that the DW would have go live 2 weeks before the CRM system.

  • (cs) in reply to LRB
    LRB:
    I can empathize with Martin. I just got a call last night stating that my contract was being terminated short because of failure to meet an impossible deadline. Strangely, I'm really not that upset over it. :)

    I'm willing to bet that Martin's PM knew what she was doing. She knew it was impossible for Martin to honestly comply with her request. She didn't care as long as she got her "results" or she had someone to place blame on for not getting the results. In the corporate world it's more about knowing how to place blame on others than actually producing anything yourself. And the sad part is that programmers are often blamed for higher ups making impossible committments.

    Amen. It is even more so in government ... CYOA's the word. In that situation I would have reported in writing on Thursday that no survey addressee has taken the survey - and would have omitted the word "yet".

  • Dr. Whoski (unregistered)

    In Soviet Russia, space-time bends YOU!

  • Adrian Martin (unregistered)

    First!

    ( rtfa ! )

  • (cs) in reply to Heinz Gorgon Mittelmacher
    Heinz Gorgon Mittelmacher:
    Dax:
    http://www.mensa.org/

    From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensa_International

    Mensa International is the largest, oldest, and best-known high-IQ society in the world. The organization restricts its membership to people with high testable IQs. Specifically, potential members must score within the top 2% (98th percentile) of any approved standardized intelligence test.

    They are also a bunch of eugenicist nuts who are organized in the only sensible superinterlligent way, by the führer principle. Unfortunately, since they all think they are the smartest, there is a lot of shouting and name-calling in between the just-hanging-out-with-other-people-who-think-they-are-smart business (which is one of the reasons there are so many other microscopic high-IQ societies).

    --HGM. One IQ test, in millitary, full marks, in case anyone wants to know, and I suspect mensans will when they read this.

    Bling!

    On the mensa: I suspect the same ....

    On the military IQ test thing: that only means that you are able to walk on two legs and saluted everything painted green at the same time ...

  • PC Paul (unregistered) in reply to Jimmy Jones
    Jimmy Jones:
    Lady Nocturne:
    In Spanish, "mensa" means stupid.

    FWIW.

    No it doesn't.

    The word "mensa" doesn't exist in Spanish. The closest word I can think of is "menta" (which means "mint").

    Doesn't matter. It should.

  • PC Paul (unregistered) in reply to real_aardvark
    real_aardvark:

    BTW, what exactly is the point of the "reply" button?

    That's easy.

    You use the 'reply' button to start a new thread, instead of replying to an old one. You have to use the 'quote' button to do that.

    The DailyWTF Forum design wins again!

    Captcha: muhahaha. Indeed.

  • (cs) in reply to dbs
    dbs:
    ... the problem is you're not making it clear to them why it it's impossible.

    SO where's the fault? Management for asking for something they want and not getting it, or the employee for not doing something because he can't articulate why it's impossible in a way that management understands?

    It's always managements fault, that is why they are management. In theory a manager is supposed to facilitate the actual business activities. Even if the employee actually screwed up, it's still managements fault because they signed on as boss...they carry responsibility for what their underlings do. I can't emphasize this enough, managers should be held accountable for what they do and what their departments/projects do, no matter who actually screwed up they are the ones who should've made sure it didn't happen.

    However, assuming the story is at all true and/or accurate, in this case it is 100% managements fault. To blame the employee for not being able to communicate such an obvious problem is just silly. Management is supposed to be better at communicating so unless the employee was a complete social retard with turrets and aphasia then the manager is responsible for communicating with him (even then actually). Obviously this is not the way it works in the real world, but that is just one of the problems with the world. Managers tend to focus on their rear ends rather than good of the company. This extends to covering other managers, because you may need the help someday.

    I really have a hard time believing this story however. If its an impossible task meant to get rid of the employee, that I can believe. Somebody actually being that stupid...I hope not.

  • Dan (unregistered) in reply to PC Paul
    PC Paul:
    Jimmy Jones:
    Lady Nocturne:
    In Spanish, "mensa" means stupid.

    FWIW.

    No it doesn't.

    The word "mensa" doesn't exist in Spanish. The closest word I can think of is "menta" (which means "mint").

    Doesn't matter. It should.

    in colloquial Mexican Spanish, 'mensa' means 'stupid woman'.

  • Bob ArdKor (unregistered) in reply to PC Paul

    I must add here that "mensa" doesn't mean anything in French.

    I think.

  • Alchymist (unregistered) in reply to CodeReaper
    CodeReaper:
    Well, the answer is simple...

    Build a time-machine. It doesn't matter how long it takes, because once it's done, you can go back to any previous point.

    I envision such a system using a thin suit with tubes running from various parts of your body to other parts, redistributing the "excess time" that is not needed. Really, how long DOES it take to digest a burrito?

    How MENSAlly retarded do you have to be not to think of that?

    P.S. Don't shoot your grandfather when you get there... he owes me money.

    Even assuming that the CPC (chronology protection conjecture - you can't travel to the past) is false, most suggestions for time machines nowadays won't allow you to travel to a time before the time machine was built. Let that be a warning. Make sure you build your time machine before you get into this sort of problem.

    Disclaimer: I used to be a member of Mensa.

  • Rob Withey (unregistered)

    I blame Paula. Why couldn't she receive the results before Martin sent them?

  • Alchymist (unregistered) in reply to Zylon
    Zylon:
    Mithras:
    Hmmm, but wouldn't the denominator also be 0? And 0/0 is indeterminate, so it'd be more like Option A - NaN% Option B - NaN% Option C - NaN% Option D - NaN%

    which would be befittinfly WTFish anyway...

    NaN == 0, for sufficiently small values of NaN.

    There's a better option than NaN

    http://forums.thedailywtf.com/forums/thread/105841.aspx

  • Shaper (unregistered) in reply to dbs
    dbs:
    Sorry, this sounds like a basic miscommunication issue... SO where's the fault? Management for asking for something they want and not getting it, or the employee for not doing something because he can't articulate why it's impossible in a way that management understands?

    Just out of interest, which part of "cause traditionally comes before effect" is particularly hard to communicate?

    And FWIW, I've worked in promotions and community management roles, I'm a fairly skilled communicator, and I've had managers like this and ended up in exactly this situation.

    The relevant equations are:

    Manager promised something impossible = Manager's problem

    Manager ignores the impossibility of the order = Employee's problem

    Employees problem => !Manager's problem

    This only works if you either can't escalate the dispute further up the tree, or if, when the dispute is escalated, the higher-up managers work on the basis of:

    Interpretation: Sub-manager's idiocy => Sub-manager is an idiot, with some splash damage for those who employed him (ie, me)

    Action: Punishing Sub-manager => Loss of face for management in general, truculent underling

    Interpretation: Employee being difficult => Reprimand employee

    Action: Reprimanded employee = Safe. Management officially loses no face, my underlings are still motivated and the only fuming person is so far down the ladder that they simply don't matter to me.

    It's intellectually dishonest to a point that is skirts insanity, but I've seen this mindset in management time and time again in different companies.

    Tackle the problem, put managers' noses out of joint but get it resolved, or paper over the problem and the only people who get pissed off are irrelevant peons.

    "Right" and "wrong" isn't as important as "management happy" and "management sad".

    If you've never worked somewhere like that, then you're a very lucky person - pray your luck continues.

    However, never, ever, ever, under any circumstances assume that it doesn't happen.

    Oh, and insanely frustrating as the situation is when it occurs, nothing makes it worse than some smart-ass on the internet immediately blaming you because "nobody's that stupid". They are.

  • Steve (unregistered)

    I think the way Martin handled the situation wasn't that good(we just can't avoid such suckers in real world everywhere we work).

    If I am Martin, I would setup the survey using those web 2.0 survey website which takes only few minutes to be done instead of developing the site. By doing so, you won't need any testing and thus can immediately email the participants to join it. You can tell the PM "yes, you can get the real-time result NOW but to get complete result, it will depend on how fast everybody responds..you can give them phone calls individually as a PM if you want"

  • (cs) in reply to schmitty
    schmitty:
    I had a client who wanted the mind reading select list. She hadn't discovered the ctrl key. It was a list of 8 items in a multiple select. She wanted me to reorder the items according to how she wanted to select them on each visit to the page. How else was shift only going to select the items she needed.

    With only 8 items, you could have reasonably replaced it with a "check all that apply" series of check boxes. But then someone (possibly the same client) would complain that shift didn't work, forcing them to perform as many as six (count 'em, six!) extra steps.

    Mega bonus points for anyone who finds (or creates) a site that uses JavaScript to add shift-click behavior to a series of check boxes.

  • Spanish reader (unregistered) in reply to Rafael Larios

    It does exists, but it is only used in some countries of South America, never in Spain.

    And it is "registered" by the RAE. You can check it here: menso

  • Heinz Gorgon Mittelmacher (unregistered) in reply to cklam
    Dax:
    http://www.mensa.org/

    On the military IQ test thing: that only means that you are able to walk on two legs and saluted everything painted green at the same time ...

    Yes, that's what I thought, too.

  • akatherder (unregistered)

    The programmer simply needs to create a report page and email it to the PM (CC'ed to the manager).

    "Here is the report which provides results for the survey. Per our discussion, I completed my portion of this project and delivered the survey to you ahead of schedule. As you can see by the report, no one has taken the survey yet, but the results will be available once you have communicated to the users and they have taken the survey."

    That is the act of a rational human being who has decent communication skills and wants to CYA. Being belligerent is another option if you don't value your job.

  • Da' Man (unregistered) in reply to real_aardvark

    I just found this article about mensa. Thought that one or two of you might find it interesting:

    http://www.hs.fi/english/article/For+love+of+the+Gaussian+curve/1135224349312

    Greetings from Finland ;-)

    Captch: alarm

  • Wombat (unregistered) in reply to Mike
    Mike:
    Aside from resume padding, what good is MENSA, anyway? I never see them mentioned as a contributing force in any of the stuff I read about in Scientific American.

    I think MENSA gives people something to do and makes it easy for them to associate with other, like-minded people. For example, playing intellectually challenging games with other intelligent people in order to keep themselves amused.

    Me, I do that with booze and computer games but everyone is different.

  • (cs) in reply to gwenhwyfaer
    gwenhwyfaer:
    I always found the concept of a group of people who feel the need to demonstrate their genius-level intelligence by joining a club rather suspect.

    I always found the concept of a group of people who feel the need to demonstrate their pro-athlete-level physicality by joining a gym rather suspect.

  • raj (unregistered)

    Sadly, this sort of crap goes on all the time. When I first became a webmaster in early 1996, I was expected to do things JavaScript just couldn't do at the time. And yes, I got fired for arguing about the impossibility. It comes of morons being promoted to "boss"/ project manager, as well as politics. I came across a post this week saying "geeks need to be managed by geeks". Too true.

  • Taerhael (unregistered) in reply to Jimmy Jones
    Jimmy Jones:
    Lady Nocturne:
    In Spanish, "mensa" means stupid.

    FWIW.

    No it doesn't.

    The word "mensa" doesn't exist in Spanish. The closest word I can think of is "menta" (which means "mint").

    Yes, it does exist, at least in Mexico, where "mensa" is a stupid woman and "menso" a stupid man.

  • jim (unregistered)

    i only know one guy who's in mensa, and it cemented my opinion that it's a book club for pretentious w******. by the way, i know a few people who took the entrance test--including myself--we all scored 142, which is the highest iq on that specific test. mensa, people, is blatantly a sham.

  • (cs) in reply to PC Paul
    PC Paul:
    Jimmy Jones:
    Lady Nocturne:
    In Spanish, "mensa" means stupid.

    FWIW.

    No it doesn't.

    The word "mensa" doesn't exist in Spanish. The closest word I can think of is "menta" (which means "mint").

    Doesn't matter. It should.

    Google says it does and translates mensa as stupid. Case closed as far as I am concerned.

  • Reciprocity (unregistered) in reply to Anonymous Mensa-Member

    @ Anonymous Mensa-Member "Beeing a membeer of Mensa myself ..."

    BWAHAHA!! Mensa member my ass.

    Beeing. Classic.

  • Reciprocity (unregistered) in reply to Anonymous Mensa-Member

    @ Anonymous Mensa-Member "Beeing a membeer of Mensa myself ..."

    BWAHAHA!! Mensa member my ass.

    Beeing. Membeer. Classic.

  • OBCENEIKON (unregistered) in reply to dbs

    Your joking right? How is it the managements fault? If anyone is to take the blame, it should be the HR department for hiring a completely incompetent manager.

    It should be common sense to EVERYONE that survey results arent pulled out of thin air (well, not all survey results :P) and they require people to take a survey...and to be able to take a survey, they must know how to access the survey.

  • cognac (unregistered) in reply to tec
    tec:
    I agree with your premise that communication is the responsibility of both parties; however, that responsibility doesn't need to be shared evenly and in some cases one party may so confound the other that communication is impossible.

    Case in point: I once generated some online graphs showing all of our various data in different levels of detail. All was great with daily, monthly, and yearly graphs. When it came time to dealing with quarterly graphs, we had a massive miscommunication that I must sadly admit I was unable to overcome.

    My customer insisted that the graphs were exactly what she wanted, except the quarterly graphs were wrong because (in this particular case) I was dividing yearly data by four and not five.

    For hours I tried to explain there are four quarters in a year in much the same way there are four quarters in a dollar. In hopes of trying to find some common ground, I asked her to show me the five quarters. She began that January 1st was the beginning of a quarter, April 1st was the beginning of the second quarter, July 1st was the beginning of the 3rd quarter, October 1st was the beginning of the 4th quarter, and because you had to end it, December 31 was then end of the quarter. Logically, since she clearly pointed out five (not four) dates, then the data must be divided by five.

    At some point I yielded saying I would generate a graph that divides the data by five, but I refuse to label it "Quarterly" because that simply is not correct.

    At this point I believe she started yelling and I think there was some crying involved.

    I accept the issue is my fault because I was unable to communicate reality in a clear and understandable manner. So what do you do when logic, reason, analogy, pictures, and math fail?

    There are FOUR quarters! </picard>

  • Dave (unregistered)

    I got chewed out once for selecting SSL as the solution for secure communications on a program. Not because I chose SSL, per se, but because the requirements did not SPECIFY SSL. I guess I could have implemented a custom, non-standard solution that would have cost 50X more, but I chose that darn SSL and took the hit for the team. What was I thinking?!

    As for MENSA, as soon as someone identifies themselves a member, I deem them irrelevant. They're compensating. And they always seem to underachieve.

  • Abscissa (unregistered) in reply to TheJasper
    TheJasper:
    ...unless the employee was a complete social retard with turrets and aphasia...

    What do mounted guns have to do with this?

  • Tanya the Red (unregistered) in reply to MensaMember
    MensaMember:
    Martin should have done the obvious, and given the PM person the results of the survey. The fact that zero people have taken the survey doesn't mean that there are no results.

    I like that solution! And you can say stupid things like "we have yet to see any negative feedback." : )

  • mnature (unregistered) in reply to not so sure

    An IQ test measures certain cognitive abilities. Common sense is not one of them. The quality of the test is fine, but do not assume that high IQ means any better ability to interact with people or things.

    To be honest, having a high IQ simply means one thing: You are able to do really well on an IQ test. There are some peripheral findings, such as good visualization, some math skills, and some problem-solving abilities.

    However, you will find these skills (an by looking at the membership of MENSA, this is very obvious) spread across all the stratum of employment opportunities and incomes. Some MENSA members are in prison, others are in congress, some of them run companies, and some do computer support. Some make millions of dollars per year, and some are on welfare.

  • mnature (unregistered) in reply to not so sure

    An IQ test measures certain cognitive abilities. Common sense is not one of them. The quality of the test is fine, but do not assume that high IQ means any better ability to interact with people or things.

    To be honest, having a high IQ simply means one thing: You are able to do really well on an IQ test. There are some peripheral findings, such as good visualization, some math skills, and some problem-solving abilities.

    However, you will find these skills (and by looking at the membership of MENSA, this is very obvious) spread across all the stratum of employment opportunities and incomes. Some MENSA members are in prison, others are in congress, some of them run companies, and some do computer support. Some make millions of dollars per year, and some are on welfare.

  • (cs) in reply to Antony Curtis
    Antony Curtis:
    newfweiler:
    (What if the universe really were a finite sphere but it appeared infinite because the farther away you get from the center, the smaller you get? So that the edge of the sphere is actually the limit? You probably don't understand limits so I'll explain them to you in the next fourteen paragraphs. So you see, you'd never actually reach the edge because you keep getting smaller so you think it's infinite. I have all the math in my head but I don't feel like writing it down, but it's all in what I just said so I freely give it to whatever physicist wants to be the next Einstein. Fame and fortune aren't for me.)

    Sounds like Zeno's Paradox proposed as a sphere. Not really original given that Zeno's Parodox originated in Ancient Greece.

    Wow! Congratulations! You qualify for membership in the Higher-IQ-Than-Mensa Society!

    I see they came to an agreement on the voting procedure:

    Voting for candidates for elective office shall be on a preferential basis, i.e. members will rank their preferences for all or some of the candidates in terms of their first choice, second choice, etc. The Elections Officer shall first tally the votes to determine whether any candidate has a simple majority of the first-choice votes. Those that have shall be considered elected. Those votes which fail to meet this test shall be subject to a second tally in which the information contained in all choices shall be utilized by a weighted vote, the weights being the precise reverse of the rankings. The remaining candidates receiving the majority of all weighted, preference votes shall be deemed elected. In the case of a tie on the second tally, a majority vote by the existing Executive Committee shall break the tie.
  • Steve (unregistered) in reply to Anonymous Mensa-Member

    Well, I turned down a MENSA invite because they didn't measure up to my peers who can bend space and time :-)

  • Richard Dribbles (unregistered) in reply to hwiz

    What's IQ? ;)

  • JarFil (unregistered) in reply to tec
    tec:
    My customer insisted that the graphs were exactly what she wanted, except the quarterly graphs were wrong because (in this particular case) I was dividing yearly data by four and not five.

    I accept the issue is my fault because I was unable to communicate reality in a clear and understandable manner. So what do you do when logic, reason, analogy, pictures, and math fail?

    Quite simple: you shouldn't let a customer decide your "working procedure" (dividing? that's sooo technical) and just stick to requirements. If in need, use external references to point out how you DO complain with the requirements.

    Something like dict.org:

    Quarter

    1. One of four equal parts into which anything is divided

    Captcha: craaazy... that for sure!

  • Charles Copeland (unregistered)

    Jesum criminy...good thing they didn't ask the poor kid if he'd sign the write-up, or else they could've gotten him for not knowing in advance if he would've or not...

  • Lance (unregistered)

    Things never change. In the 80s during my mainframe days, I had a boss who publicly berated me because I was either "unwilling or just too stupid to help a customer squeeze just a few more bytes onto..." an already full tape. Gah!

  • Charles Copeland (unregistered) in reply to Lance

    LOL! I've been "released from my commitments" at a couple of jobs for inabilities to perform certain things with superpowers I don't have, so I hear ya. But I've also been known to return the public berating with an extra dose of public retribution of my own...(whispering) that means ripping away any last bastion of credibility the "boss" might have had until then. Doesn't seem to keep me gainfully employed, but it sure does wonders for the satisfaction part of the old brain. =)

  • (cs) in reply to its me
    its me:
    1. Enough with the polluting of the threads with "what does ____ mean?" Jeez, it's called Google people, if you don't know, look it up.... Be self-sufficient for a change.
    1. This story is either complete crap, or we're reading a very one-sided opinion of it. My seven year old can clearly understand you can't have answers before you ask questions. If the PM couldn't understand this, then the Boss should have, and....

    2. So this guy just accepts this crap? Ok, so we're in bizarro world where the PM and the boss don't understand you get answers only after the questions are asked; so you work up the food chain people. The boss' boss, or that boss' boss will understand, and if not then clearly Martin is not in sufficient command of the spoken language to convey his thoughts on the matter....

    And now back to your regularly scheduled "is this Java or C#?" subject matter....

    -Me

    I think this is a true story. Mostly because i heard the dumbest set of phonecalls in my life on the internet RE: a phone company's charges to a customer, and their inability to figure out that .02 Cents was different than .02 dollars. It went through THREE people on the recording (service rep, that rep's manager, and then another manager), the whole time saying that .02 dollars == .02 cents... I know 5 year olds that can tell you that they're different. and he was communicating very effectively, but because the data (billing rate was 2 tenths of a cent per minute, so $0.002 per minute) showing on their screen looked to them as though it was .02 cents per minute when in fact it was 10 times as much as that. UGH! MISANTHROPY FOR THE WIN!

    I swear to god, some people are just so brain-dead that it's amazing ANYTHING gets done on this planet.

  • Some Anonymous Guy (unregistered)

    I think this was one of those cases where the message was given implicitly: To fabricate the results instead of conducting an actual survey.

    This sort of 'get the result regardless of the means' mentality is increasing in todays highly competitive business world, and the consumers (whom the workers also are for countless other businesses) are the ones paying the price (usually not through product costs but rather as consequences to the society those consumers live in).

  • Anonymous (unregistered)

    Not plausible, whatsoever. Sounds like a story someone made up during a frustrating coding session of a stereotypical office scenario. But I didn't believe a word of it.

  • gelo (unregistered)

    Obviously NOT a HERO....hehehe.

  • air cushion vehicle (unregistered) in reply to Drum D.

    According to translate.google.com the German word 'mensa' means refectory, a communal dining-hall. Hence the confusion. Haven't you people ever heard of the internet?

  • Rahul V (unregistered)

    If you wanted it the day before yesterday, why didn't you tell me the day after tomorrow?

Leave a comment on “Ability to Bend Space-Time a Must”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article