- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
it must hav ebeen, quite literally, his fucking desk.
Admin
Admin
As bad as having nooners on the desk in his cubicle....
Admin
I think this is the part where we all run giggling around the playground. C'mon guys, this is a waste of time. Nothing clever or interesting here.
CAPTCHA refoveo - What you do if you liked foveo-ing the first time.
Admin
Where have you been the past few months?
Admin
That's retarded. The owner wasn't policing anything. The "censorship" was done either as a joke, or, as he stated, as a courtesy to those readers could get in trouble at work or who would be unable to read it at work if it were left as is.
Jebus, pay attention and grow up.
CAPTCHA: appellatio -- "She performed
on his while he her ."Admin
Whoever thinks there's a justifiable reason to keep sex toys in your desk drawer (unless they're somehow related to your job, such as if you design or sell them), is a moron.
Admin
You're seriously comparing keeping medical necessities private in a desk drawer with keeping sex toys there?
And if they're that damn important and private, don't leave them in your desk when you know the company is moving, know they're thoroughly cleaning house, and have had time to prepare for the move.
Perv-boy had no reasonable expectation of privacy. Sure, whatshisname could have called him first about the bag before opening it, but he's not a cop, and this isn't a court of law, so search warrants, exigent circumstances, and all that doesn't apply. He's going office to office, desk to desk, doing a boring, tedious job, and some retard left a bunch of stuff in a locked drawer. I can't say I'd have bothered to handle it any differently, and I wouldn't feel bad about it after the fact.
Admin
Ok. Granted that possessing such sex toys on company property and time IS unprofessional - as well as embarassing.... It should be one of those things that goes with out having to spell it out in the rule books...
The problem is that for the company to permit or knowingly condone such to exist on the company premisis legally leaves the company open to charges of allowing a sexually opressive atmosphere for female workes... it falls into the same catagory as allowing men to have the naked playboy centerfold pix in their lockers....
Under THAT premise, he would have already been gone in many companies. Thus avoiding all the possible reprecussions of the later porn down laoding incident.
Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin
I thought the editing made the article better. Wordplay is fun.
Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin
No need to FTFY, is there?
Admin
Admin
Is it traditional to embed editor comments or click handlers in the HTML source of WTF articles?
Admin
After a while, you don't even see the markup. All I see is blonde, brunette, redhead...
Admin
Although, in this case, the worst possible explanation for each censored phrase is the correct one.
Admin
The second legal question is whether there was trespass when the sealed black bag was opened. The company is guilty of trespass if they did not own the bag and did not have the consent of the owner to open it (such as a company policy that subjected all bags on the property to search). There are no legally-relevant facts one way or the other in the story that could let us know either way.
Assuming arguendo the company didn't own the bag, it could still try to defend itself with the claim that it had to know the contents of the bag in order to attempt to return it to its rightful owner and was thereby privileged to break the law due to necessity. (Yes, you can often legally break the law if it's "necessary".)
Assuming the company is liable for trespass, there is still the issue of proving damages. He didn't lose his job after that, and no one can identify him to this article, so I don't think the lawsuit would be worth much if anything. Especially since he was never publicly humiliated. He'd get a minimum of $1 if he won, though.
Addendum (2011-02-01 20:02): @jverd
But you're probably right about the invasion of privacy. It depends on announced company policy in most places, I bet.
Admin
That's arguably a better story than the OP. Especially as it's a sound effects group for a gaming company... Someone in the chain managed to forget to explain to higher ups that decent sound effects engineers need to get highly creative to get their sounds. Extremely, bizarrely creative.
Admin
Ali is a very common name in some parts of the world.
Admin
Admin
in other words, "You stay clbutty, the Daily WTF"
Admin
Well **** my ****ing ****, are people really that ****ing precious that you ****ing can't say ****, or ****, or ****? That really ****s my ****, I ****ing can't ****** the ********* who ******** this ********. ****** me ****** ****** ********** *******. ******* ******* **** **** with a gerbil!
Admin
Specifically, a rubber dick move.
Admin
Admin
Don't you mean 'squick, squick, squick, squick, squick!'?
Admin
WTF is up with the unicorns? (If you didn't see them, click on the words
turkey baster
in the story)Admin
The only company policy that might apply is sexual harassment, but since in this case the objects were hidden from view and know one knew about them, they could not offend anyone.
Agreed. From the two guys crowbarring open a drawer, I inferred that the employee no longer worked there, in that case it would have been fine. A current employee should have first option of clearing out their own desk.Admin
being a pervert certainly isnt any of employers business, but wtf was that guy doing with this "equipment" at work?
Admin
The real WTF is destroying company property (breaking the lock on the desk) instead of just phoning Derek and asking him to come unlock it and clear it out.
Admin
I cleaned up a shared work related email box after my boss left the company. I noticed it contained some personal email exchange and decided to do what he apparently forgot and delete the personal mails before anyone else set their eyes on them.
Nice thing to do, right? Using shared work email for personal stuff is quite silly and could lead to embarrasment.
I have to admit that I couldn't resist taking a peek myself though...
Anyway, I think the guy would be happy to know that I quietly deleted his mails instead of reporting them to HR or legal.
Now it's just my soul into which has been burned an image of my ex-boss engaging a sick, twisted, 300 pound straight version of that double-headed turkey baster scene from the movie Requiem for a dream.
Admin
I work at home.
Admin
You must be from the US. In the old country, we have a whole different set of rules where the "boss" is not really the boss and you cannot be fired on the spot unless caught stealing redhanded. And even then it's difficult.
On a side not, let's say this Derek would store his toys in his coat or bag and hang it on the wall. In your reasoning, the company owuld be perfectly in their right to search those at will. With that approach to dignity and privacy, I bet you would love to live in Northern Korea or the old Eastern Germany ...
Admin
Aince Alistair is a guy's name, and the piece kept using the feminine pronoun
Unless Alistair is a TV, or the Yanks are really getting fruity with using the names for either gender or a rename went wrong in the article
Admin
All this talk about 'privacy' and 'company policy' seems to ignore that the guy who opened the bag was just that - a guy who opened a bag. He then had a choice to escalate it or deal with it quietly. Does he have an explicit duty to report the contents of the drawer? If not, why not just return it and let the matter drop? Even if 'yes', it would be possible to be discreet: "sealed bag", "bag containing personal effects, returned to owner". It seems like a huge waste of multiple peoples' time to do anything different.
I don't know, maybe Derek was a prick and they wanted him gone. But was the contents of the bag illegal (kiddie porn etc)? Could it have been a risk to safety (gun, explosives etc)? No? Grow up, return it and get over it!
And there are plenty of reasonable reasons to have the bag there (apparently it wasn't used frequently enough to notice it was missing from the new desk). Perhaps he doesn't have a place at home that's definitely kid-proof - or wife-proof. Perhaps he took it in to work planning to take to a "meeting", and forgot about it? Hell, maybe it was a joke present - or a serious one for his wife/partner? - or a prop for a stag do!
Yeah, the TRWTF is even thinking to involve the guy's manager, HR, lawyers - and that all of them thought it was appropriate to escalate!
Admin
Yeah, same thing occurred to me. There are any number of things you might have to bring to work one day that were strictly for your manager's or HR's eyes only.
Admin
Going through someone's coat when they're accessible requires the person to be present and compliant, since his coat is his property. Unless he left the company after being fired horrendously and walked out muttering about burning the building down...
But he did not have it in his coat did he? He had it in a desk belonging to the company, in an area that had to be sorted and cleared - which he knew about.
Admin
You're all more perverted than most of the furries I speak to.
This is greatly not helped by the fact that at least 10% of you commenters are not furries.
Admin
Admin
Admin
Hm, my organisation has all kinds of statistics about its internet usage published on the web: Things like total upload and download volume, most visited sites (Wikipedia toping the list) and also most popular sites by download volume...
One month, the last one of these couldn't be published for "technical reasons"... I asked the guys from IT and they told me that was because one particular "documentaries" download site would be on the top of the list.
They also traced it back to one particular user who had a need to download several gigabytes (!) of documentaries in that month.
They refused to tell me, however, what HR did with the guy, nor if he is willing to share his collection with his colleagues.
Admin
Curiouser and curiouser...
Admin
Our story is that all internet browsing statistics (Including site URL's) in the company were published online on the company intranet. It was mainly us IT folk who browsed the log though as regular users tended to forget about the policy. One woman probably forgot about it one Friday after company sponsored drinks and spent the evening downloading nasty animal porn. I don't think any of us ever looked at her the same way afterwards. The policy of publicising your internet habits dropped away shortly afterwards.
Admin