• OldIdePedant (unregistered)

    Didn't we always save the CD-ROM to the hard drive, for both performance reasons, and because many CD-ROMs wouldn't even work as master...

  • (cs)
    OP:
    [ . . . ] what you'd do if a female pupil came onto you? [ . . . ]
    How much the meaning of a sentence can be changed by omitting a single space!
  • (cs) in reply to Leighton
    Leighton:
    The story isn't that far from the truth in all honesty.

    Dave did arrive in Jeans and T-Shirt and almost late

    Almost late=on time?
  • FreeMarketFan (unregistered) in reply to Valued Service
    Valued Service:
    Leighton:
    The story isn't that far from the truth in all honesty.

    Dave did arrive in Jeans and T-Shirt and almost late The Headteacher was Male The interview panel consisted of the Headteacher, the Head of IT, my Boss and a Governer The first part of the interview was the question part. I have no idea about Dave's qualifications I was not just relying on my qualifications as I had around 5 years of PC knowledge by then. The second part of the interview was the technical part and this is where I knew I had got the job as Dave was unable to identify the difference between the CPU and Memory (I KID YOU NOT!!!) I was offered the job on the spot.

    To the editor:

    Please don't change facts.

    I don't care if it adds to the tension saying that the competitor was more competent, that's not what happened.

    Your comment will be deleted shortly - don't worry mine were during the last Hanzo fiasco.

  • (cs) in reply to Anon
    Anon:
    Somewhat O/T, but am I the only one who would rather be interviewed than be the interviewer.

    Interviews are easy, you just talk about yourself. Interviewing is hard, you have to pretend to give a shit about the person you are interviewing.

    No, you're not alone. My boss told me a couple of days ago that I'm going to be one of the people interviewing a candidate in a couple of weeks. It's only, I think, the second time I will have been on that side of the interview table, and I'm not looking forward to it.

  • J (unregistered) in reply to operagost
    operagost:
    Leighton:
    The story isn't that far from the truth in all honesty.

    Dave did arrive in Jeans and T-Shirt and almost late

    Almost late=on time?
    Right??

    The only reason I ever aim to be earlier than the scheduled time is just in case something delays me. There is no virtue in actually being early.

  • user (unregistered)

    The real WTF: "quite shocked to see the creative licence"

  • (cs) in reply to OldIdePedant
    OldIdePedant:
    Didn't we always save the CD-ROM to the hard drive, for both performance reasons, and because many CD-ROMs wouldn't even work as master...
    1. No. With ATA, the opposite it true. Two drives on one cable have to arbitrate the I/O. In addition, both drives can only run at a maximum speed equal to the speed of the slowest drive, so if your CD drive could only run at DMA mode 2 or, even worse, PIO, so would your hard disk. This may have changed later with ATA-5. 2. A CD-ROM that wouldn't work as master is broken or misconfigured. The settings, via jumper, were master, slave, or cable select. Cable select determined the role based on the position of the device on a special cable with a disabled pin. The problem came in when uninformed people used a normal IDE cable and expected it to work magically. The safest way was simply to set one to master and one to slave. About the only configuration that might not work is a single drive as slave... which is silly and not needed. ATA-5 fixed this by removing pin 28 on the slave device connector.
  • foo (unregistered) in reply to Anonymous Will
    Anonymous Will:
    D8:
    Curious perversions in Information Technology seems fitting.
    Only if you define being attracted to someone only a few years younger than yourself (and able to choose her own sex life) as perverted.
    According to the Standard Creepiness Rule, it may well be, depending on the exact ages.

    (We don't get to reference this one so often here.)

  • foo (unregistered) in reply to Anomaly
    Anomaly:
    Captcha: Plaga - Same captcha two posts in a row? How often does that happen.
    Assuming there's like 10 different captchas on this site (just a wild guess, might be 11 or even 12), about 10%.

    CAPTCHA: Ask my browser's auto-complete.

  • anonymous (unregistered) in reply to Matt Westwood
    Matt Westwood:
    d) TRWTF is so-called "civilized" Western nations whose age of consent is higher than 16 (are there any?)
    Much of the USA (not most, but many states) set the age of consent at 17 or 18; the rest set it at 16. None set it lower than 16. Many of them have loopholes (or carry lighter charges, e.g. a misdemeanor or lower-class felony) for acts between consenting individuals if the age gap is small.

    Note that this only applies to the acts themselves; any sort of recording would fall afoul of Federal laws which specify a minimum age of 18 for all persons involved.

    ObiWayneKenobi:
    'MURICA of course. In most places it's 18, except in some cases where it's like 16 if one party isn't over 24.
    This much at least is factually incorrect. The Wikipedia link has already been posted, but in most of the states, the age of consent is 16.

    If you have daily interaction with teens in the course of your work, then it's an entirely different scenario: it's quite probably illegal for you to pursue any romantic interests with them, although usually this only applies while they're still students.

    ObiWayneKenobi:
    As a general rule though even if not illegal, it's likely to get you fired, although not arrested for "statutory rape" (the real WTF).
    That much is accurate, like it or not. Uncouth interaction will quite likely get you canned if not caned. "She was legal" isn't a very persuasive argument when rabid parents are at your throat.

  • Dominic (unregistered)

    TRWTF is getting stressed before an interview just because some slob walks into the room.

  • Anomaly (unregistered)

    TRWTF is dave not getting a sexual harassment lawsuit filed against him by the Female interviewer.

  • Scourge of Programmers! (unregistered)

    Always have security cameras. That's what we do in our shop.

  • (cs) in reply to J
    J:
    operagost:
    Leighton:
    The story isn't that far from the truth in all honesty.

    Dave did arrive in Jeans and T-Shirt and almost late

    Almost late=on time?
    Right??

    The only reason I ever aim to be earlier than the scheduled time is just in case something delays me. There is no virtue in actually being early.

    Rubbish. Make sure you ten minutes to fifteen minutes early. This gives you time to be offered a cup of coffee by the receptionist, to whom you have the opportunity to demonstrate your charming and urbane character. There will be reading material in the foyer (industry journals, etc), where you will be seated waiting for the interview to start. Read it.

    By the time your interview is ready to start, you will probably have had time to drink your coffee (unless it has been made with superheated steam), and you'll be refreshed and ready to perform. If you haven't finished it, take it with you so you can demonstrate your skills at simultaneously carrying a coffee-cup (complete with saucer and spoon) and a briefcase containing your portfolio, while opening awkward doors that need two hands. If you can't do this, then obviously you're not a good fit and you might as well turn round and bugger off home again.

  • sigh... (unregistered) in reply to nonpartisan
    nonpartisan:
    getmeaguiness:
    If this was the initial comment, would I frist or should I frist?
    Right or wrong, you should frist.

    But could you?

  • (cs)

    There IS a solution to much of this. Just be married to a VERY hot wife, who is better than the jail bait you might encounter on the job. If they come on to you, just mention your wife, and go from there. A good line might be: Can you ask my wife if it is OK?

    Of course it gets even better if your wife is in a position of "power" at the school.

    My circumstance: I have a grand niece that just turned 15 (enough said).

  • eric76 (unregistered) in reply to Matt Westwood
    Matt Westwood:
    Has to be pointed out that if the girl in question is 16, then (as Leighton is not *technically* in a position of authority over her) any relationship they do have is not actually technically illegal.

    That would depend on the location of the school.

    If it was in Texas, an employee of a public school district is barred from any sexual conduct with a student no matter the age of the student. There is NO age of consent in such cases. If the student was 20 years old, it would still be illegal.

    Also keep in mind that the age of consent is not the same in all places. It is 17 in Texas, not 16.

  • sigh... (unregistered) in reply to emaN ruoY
    emaN ruoY:
    Showing up in jeans would usually mean a quick exit from the interview, even if the working atmosphere was a very relaxed environment.

    Obviously, you don't work in tech in CA. Jeans are standard attire. My last interview was in jeans and a dress shirt. No coat, no tie. Got the job.

    If I interview someone wearing a coat/tie, my first impression is they must not have much experience.

  • Anonymous (unregistered) in reply to Matt Westwood
    Matt Westwood:
    cdosrun:
    As I read the story, neither the age of the girl nor the legal jurisdiction is mentioned.

    I don't see how you conclude that the girl is 16, or that 16 is above the age of consent where this took place.

    Or is this a troll where you intentionally act creepy?

    Your reading comprehension skills are rubbish, pal. There was no specific age of anyone mentioned in the story.
    I don't get it. The article clearly says:

    Immediately, the Governor jumped in. "Our oldest students are sixteen, and they can be a little too familiar with the staff. Are you prepared to deal with that?"
    Where is this "the article doesn't mention anyone's age" stuff coming from?
  • anonymous (unregistered)

    tl;dr: if you are one of those people who has the occasional humourous thought about boinking hot 16yo's, you'll do well to keep them to yourself; almost no good can ever come of verbalising them, even in jest. Others are probably NOT going to share your mirth at the idea, ESPECIALLY when you're interviewing for a position where you'll be encountering hot 16yo's on a daily basis.

  • (cs) in reply to anonymous
    anonymous:
    tl;dr: if you are one of those people who has the occasional humourous thought about boinking hot 16yo's, you'll do well to keep them to yourself; almost no good can ever come of verbalising them, even in jest. Others are probably NOT going to share your mirth at the idea, ESPECIALLY when you're interviewing for a position where you'll be encountering hot 16yo's on a daily basis.

    GET THIS INTO YOUR STUPID SKULL: IN BRITAIN IT IS LEGAL TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A SIXTEEN-YEAR-OLD!

  • (cs) in reply to eric76
    eric76:
    Matt Westwood:
    Has to be pointed out that if the girl in question is 16, then (as Leighton is not *technically* in a position of authority over her) any relationship they do have is not actually technically illegal.

    That would depend on the location of the school.

    If it was in Texas, an employee of a public school district is barred from any sexual conduct with a student no matter the age of the student. There is NO age of consent in such cases. If the student was 20 years old, it would still be illegal.

    Also keep in mind that the age of consent is not the same in all places. It is 17 in Texas, not 16.

    It has repeatedly been stated that this incident did not happen in Texas, but in Britain.

  • neminem (unregistered) in reply to Matt Westwood
    Matt Westwood:
    anonymous:
    tl;dr: if you are one of those people who has the occasional humourous thought about boinking hot 16yo's, you'll do well to keep them to yourself; almost no good can ever come of verbalising them, even in jest. Others are probably NOT going to share your mirth at the idea, ESPECIALLY when you're interviewing for a position where you'll be encountering hot 16yo's on a daily basis.

    GET THIS INTO YOUR STUPID SKULL: IN BRITAIN IT IS LEGAL TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A SIXTEEN-YEAR-OLD!

    And I consider that perfectly reasonable (assuming both parties are fairly young. A 16 year old and a 19 year old, yes. A 16 year old and a 35 year old, not so much.)

    It doesn't matter, though, because the question wasn't one of legality, but of sketchiness - and a romantic coupling where one person was a high school student, and the other was a school employee, is majorly sketchy regardless of ages. Even if the school employee just graduated and the student was about to, if they met at school while the employee was employed there, there should definitely not be anything going on between them until at least such time as neither person is still a student at the school. Nothing to do with age.

  • (cs) in reply to Matt Westwood
    Matt Westwood:
    GET THIS INTO YOUR STUPID SKULL: IN BRITAIN IT IS LEGAL TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A SIXTEEN-YEAR-OLD!

    So? Legal means they can't throw you in jail for it. It doesn't mean you can't be fired for it, and it certainly doesn't mean that society or we hear approve it or want to hear about it. It's a good thing that society has generally decided to get its nose out of private business, but that doesn't mean we have to approve of things we (as a society) don't make illegal.

  • Anonymous Will (unregistered) in reply to foo
    foo:
    According to the Standard Creepiness Rule, it may well be, depending on the exact ages.

    This rule applies to dating, not being attracted to people. You can't help who you're attracted to (you can only decide to act on your desires or not).

    Also, the OP is described as "not much older than the students", which suggests he wouldn't run afoul of the rule with a 16-year-old. However, since 16 is the maximum age of the students, he'd better beat them off with a stick if they do try to hit on him.

  • eric76 (unregistered) in reply to Matt Westwood
    Matt Westwood:
    eric76:
    Matt Westwood:
    Has to be pointed out that if the girl in question is 16, then (as Leighton is not *technically* in a position of authority over her) any relationship they do have is not actually technically illegal.

    That would depend on the location of the school.

    If it was in Texas, an employee of a public school district is barred from any sexual conduct with a student no matter the age of the student. There is NO age of consent in such cases. If the student was 20 years old, it would still be illegal.

    Also keep in mind that the age of consent is not the same in all places. It is 17 in Texas, not 16.

    It has repeatedly been stated that this incident did not happen in Texas, but in Britain.

    Yours was the first message that said that it might be Britain.

  • (cs) in reply to eric76
    eric76:
    Matt Westwood:
    eric76:
    Matt Westwood:
    Has to be pointed out that if the girl in question is 16, then (as Leighton is not *technically* in a position of authority over her) any relationship they do have is not actually technically illegal.

    That would depend on the location of the school.

    If it was in Texas, an employee of a public school district is barred from any sexual conduct with a student no matter the age of the student. There is NO age of consent in such cases. If the student was 20 years old, it would still be illegal.

    Also keep in mind that the age of consent is not the same in all places. It is 17 in Texas, not 16.

    It has repeatedly been stated that this incident did not happen in Texas, but in Britain.

    Yours was the first message that said that it might be Britain.

    The OP stated that it happened in the North of England.

  • (cs) in reply to Anon
    Matt Westwood:
    Has to be pointed out that if the girl in question is 16, then (as Leighton is not *technically* in a position of authority over her) any relationship they do have is not actually technically illegal.

    Depends on location [I know the story was Britain]. In many states [USA], the "rule" is if one party is under 18 (not sixteen) and there is a difference of over 18 months (to the day!) then it is in fact statutory rape.

    There was a case about a decade ago where it was the night before the girl's 18th birthday and the guy was 22. In the morning everything would have been OK. Unfortunately there was an arrest, conviction, and he got 15 years.

    The reason the police/courts/et.al. were so aggressive was that they could not get a valid case for other "activities", but this one was a slam dunk win.

  • eric76 (unregistered) in reply to Matt Westwood
    Matt Westwood:
    eric76:
    Matt Westwood:
    eric76:
    Matt Westwood:
    Has to be pointed out that if the girl in question is 16, then (as Leighton is not *technically* in a position of authority over her) any relationship they do have is not actually technically illegal.

    That would depend on the location of the school.

    If it was in Texas, an employee of a public school district is barred from any sexual conduct with a student no matter the age of the student. There is NO age of consent in such cases. If the student was 20 years old, it would still be illegal.

    Also keep in mind that the age of consent is not the same in all places. It is 17 in Texas, not 16.

    It has repeatedly been stated that this incident did not happen in Texas, but in Britain.

    Yours was the first message that said that it might be Britain.

    The OP stated that it happened in the North of England.

    Yes, but further down the page than I had read when responding to your post. At the time you made your post, all you had was a suspicion that it might be in England, not a certainty.

    Unless you can somehow see into the future.

  • EvilSnack (unregistered) in reply to Matt Westwood
    Matt Westwood:
    anonymous:
    tl;dr: if you are one of those people who has the occasional humourous thought about boinking hot 16yo's, you'll do well to keep them to yourself; almost no good can ever come of verbalising them, even in jest. Others are probably NOT going to share your mirth at the idea, ESPECIALLY when you're interviewing for a position where you'll be encountering hot 16yo's on a daily basis.

    GET THIS INTO YOUR STUPID SKULL: IN BRITAIN IT IS LEGAL TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A SIXTEEN-YEAR-OLD!

    Get this into your stupid skull: Just because it's legal, doesn't mean it's smart.

  • gse5h (unregistered) in reply to Doug
    Doug:
    TRWTF is arriving 45 minutes early for an interview.
    This was my thoughts exactly. Arriving too early is as bad as arriving too late. If I were ever this early to an interview I would hang around somewhere nearby but not AT the place I was interviewing....

    Aside from everything else, it can make people uncomfortable to know that someone is sitting waiting for prolonged periods - even when they're appointment is much later. Interesting, though that these people seem not to have noticed, given they still asked who wanted to go first...

  • Michael (unregistered)

    Matt Westwood is getting very animated here today - although with a lot less Gordon Ramsay style tourettes

  • Spencer (unregistered) in reply to herby

    [quote user="herby"]There IS a solution to much of this. Just be married to a VERY hot wife, who is better than the jail bait you might encounter on the job. If they come on to you, just mention your wife, and go from there. A good line might be: Can you ask my wife if it is OK?

    Of course it gets even better if your wife says it's OK only if she can join inquote]

    FTFY

    captcha: genitus. You, your smoking hot wife, and the hot jailbait, all enjoying each other's genitus

  • Reductio Ad Ridiculousum (unregistered) in reply to J
    J:
    operagost:
    Leighton:
    The story isn't that far from the truth in all honesty.

    Dave did arrive in Jeans and T-Shirt and almost late

    Almost late=on time?
    Right??

    The only reason I ever aim to be earlier than the scheduled time is just in case something delays me. There is no virtue in actually being early.

    Exactly. On occasion, when I've had to travel a long distance, I might actually get there an hour ahead. I do not present myself until maybe 10 min before the appt; in the meantime I review my interviewing skills/resume/whatever, including such gems as such as "where do you want to be in 5 years", "what's your worst experience", "what do you think of your current/last job", "do you plan on hitting on any of the skirts here", etc.

  • (cs) in reply to Valued Service
    Valued Service:
    To the editor:

    Please don't change facts.

    I don't care if it adds to the tension saying that the competitor was more competent, that's not what happened.

    My name is Alex Papadumbass. I am the editor and owner of this site.

    All your stories are belong to us. So keep your stinking opinion to yourself.

  • D B (unregistered) in reply to michael
    michael:
    It probably was the president's daughter.

    Yes... yes it was, Watson...

  • (cs) in reply to eric76
    eric76:
    Matt Westwood:
    eric76:
    Matt Westwood:
    eric76:
    Matt Westwood:
    Has to be pointed out that if the girl in question is 16, then (as Leighton is not *technically* in a position of authority over her) any relationship they do have is not actually technically illegal.

    That would depend on the location of the school.

    If it was in Texas, an employee of a public school district is barred from any sexual conduct with a student no matter the age of the student. There is NO age of consent in such cases. If the student was 20 years old, it would still be illegal.

    Also keep in mind that the age of consent is not the same in all places. It is 17 in Texas, not 16.

    It has repeatedly been stated that this incident did not happen in Texas, but in Britain.

    Yours was the first message that said that it might be Britain.

    The OP stated that it happened in the North of England.

    Yes, but further down the page than I had read when responding to your post. At the time you made your post, all you had was a suspicion that it might be in England, not a certainty.

    Unless you can somehow see into the future.

    Sorry, Mister Sheldon Fucking Cooper, I've completely lost the thread of what your arse-brained point was.

  • (cs) in reply to HardwareGeek
    HardwareGeek:
    Anon:
    Somewhat O/T, but am I the only one who would rather be interviewed than be the interviewer.

    Interviews are easy, you just talk about yourself. Interviewing is hard, you have to pretend to give a shit about the person you are interviewing.

    No, you're not alone. My boss told me a couple of days ago that I'm going to be one of the people interviewing a candidate in a couple of weeks. It's only, I think, the second time I will have been on that side of the interview table, and I'm not looking forward to it.

    Actually, I like being on the interviewer side, because it means I have a job and I'm not looking for one. :)

  • (cs) in reply to eric76
    eric76:
    Matt Westwood:
    Has to be pointed out that if the girl in question is 16, then (as Leighton is not *technically* in a position of authority over her) any relationship they do have is not actually technically illegal.

    That would depend on the location of the school.

    If it was in Texas, an employee of a public school district is barred from any sexual conduct with a student no matter the age of the student. There is NO age of consent in such cases. If the student was 20 years old, it would still be illegal.

    Also keep in mind that the age of consent is not the same in all places. It is 17 in Texas, not 16.

    Incomplete answer.

    Texas -The age of consent is 17. The minimum age is 14 with an age differential of 3 years; thus, those who are at least 14 years of age can legally have sex with those less than 3 years older.

    Also, you can get married at 14 with parental consent.

  • foxyshadis (unregistered) in reply to Reductio Ad Ridiculousum
    Reductio Ad Ridiculousum:
    J:
    operagost:
    Leighton:
    The story isn't that far from the truth in all honesty.

    Dave did arrive in Jeans and T-Shirt and almost late

    Almost late=on time?
    Right??

    The only reason I ever aim to be earlier than the scheduled time is just in case something delays me. There is no virtue in actually being early.

    Exactly. On occasion, when I've had to travel a long distance, I might actually get there an hour ahead. I do not present myself until maybe 10 min before the appt; in the meantime I review my interviewing skills/resume/whatever, including such gems as such as "where do you want to be in 5 years", "what's your worst experience", "what do you think of your current/last job", "do you plan on hitting on any of the skirts here", etc.
    Don't forget, "What is your greatest weakness," that wonderful question that can magically suss out your suitability to the corporate world.

  • foxyshadis (unregistered) in reply to Webhamster
    Webhamster:
    Anomaly:
    The appropriate way to go about it is wait until the student graduates then take that agonizing tension filled romance to the next level... Like my friends parents. His dad was a band director. His mom was a band member. They were friendly while she was still in school and as soon as she graduated she was no longer off limits.

    While technically there's nothing wrong with that it can get complicated. A friend of mine started teaching at a high school in his early 20's, got along well with one particular student and tongues started wagging around the school. Nothing ever actually happened. The summer after she graduated they ran into each other at an event and soon after started dating. The perception among others was that something had to have been going on because they started dating so soon after she graduated. He had to transfer to another school because the rumours were destroying his credibility where he was teaching (with both staff and students). He never did anything wrong, but the perception of others almost destroyed his career.

    Even just hearing this story brings House's Maxim to mind, "Everybody lies." At least they were able to keep whatever fooling around they did before the entirely coincidental meeting on the down low, and he didn't get arrested, more power to them both.

  • QJo (unregistered) in reply to foxyshadis
    foxyshadis:
    Webhamster:
    Anomaly:
    The appropriate way to go about it is wait until the student graduates then take that agonizing tension filled romance to the next level... Like my friends parents. His dad was a band director. His mom was a band member. They were friendly while she was still in school and as soon as she graduated she was no longer off limits.

    While technically there's nothing wrong with that it can get complicated. A friend of mine started teaching at a high school in his early 20's, got along well with one particular student and tongues started wagging around the school. Nothing ever actually happened. The summer after she graduated they ran into each other at an event and soon after started dating. The perception among others was that something had to have been going on because they started dating so soon after she graduated. He had to transfer to another school because the rumours were destroying his credibility where he was teaching (with both staff and students). He never did anything wrong, but the perception of others almost destroyed his career.

    Even just hearing this story brings House's Maxim to mind, "Everybody lies." At least they were able to keep whatever fooling around they did before the entirely coincidental meeting on the down low, and he didn't get arrested, more power to them both.

    Just goes to show how great is the social power of nosy gossips with nothing better to occupy their time than the private lives of other people.

  • Dominic (unregistered) in reply to Anomaly
    Anomaly:
    TRWTF is dave not getting a sexual harassment lawsuit filed against him by the Female interviewer.
    Dave wasn't in a position to be sued, seeing as he wasn't an employee or regularly interacting with them.
  • poopypuppy (unregistered) in reply to ObiWayneKenobi

    Blind date with a student? Risky. I couldn't answer the question without having all the data. Or rather, I couldn't answer honestly. But honesty seems not to be appreciated.

  • Fritz, a.k.a. Fritzo (unregistered)

    So, uhh, there seems to be a paragraph or two missing: the ones where any of the mentioned surreal bits happen? As it is there is no mention of even out-of-the-ordinary goings-on during the interview.

  • poopypuppy (unregistered) in reply to DaveK

    I'd brush it off with a smile

  • Fritz, a.k.a. Fritzo (unregistered) in reply to poopypuppy
    poopypuppy:
    I'd brush it off with a smile

    Nothing published on this site has the power to make anyone smmile, let alone laugh. TDWTF is the Garfield of websites.

  • (cs) in reply to Leighton
    Leighton:
    The story isn't that far from the truth in all honesty.

    Dave did arrive in Jeans and T-Shirt and almost late The Headteacher was Male The interview panel consisted of the Headteacher, the Head of IT, my Boss and a Governer The first part of the interview was the question part. I have no idea about Dave's qualifications I was not just relying on my qualifications as I had around 5 years of PC knowledge by then. The second part of the interview was the technical part and this is where I knew I had got the job as Dave was unable to identify the difference between the CPU and Memory (I KID YOU NOT!!!) I was offered the job on the spot.

    That's not creative license, that's making up a story. Did the people of TheDailyWTF use to work for News of the World before?

  • Todd (unregistered)

    So if a cute girl wants to have sex with you, you have to reject her just because you work on the same place she studies? WTF?

Leave a comment on “What Should He Do, Indeed”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

Log Out

« Return to Article