Forums
Delilah works in a Python shop. Despite Python's "batteries included" design, that doesn't stop people from trying to make their own batteries from potatoes. For example, her co-worker wrote this function:
Apr 26def key_exists(element, key):
if isinstance(element, dict):
try:
element = element[key]
except KeyError:
return False
return True
A depressing quantity of software is what I would call a "data pump". I have some data over here, and I need it over there. Maybe I'm integrating into a legacy app. Or into an ERP. Or into a 3rd party API. At the end of the day, I have data in one place, and I want it in another place.
Sally has a Java application written in the Quarkus framework, which has a nightly batch that works to keep a table of Bar entities in sync with a table of Foo entities. (This anonymization comes from Sally) These exist in the same database. There is also a Bar webservice, which provides information about the Bar entities. The workflow, such as it is, is that the software needs to find all of the Foo entities that do not currently have associated Bar entities, and then call the Bar webservice to get the required information to create those Bar entities.
JB has a database table that, at first glance, looks like one of those data warehouse tables that exists to make queries performant. You know the sort, the table that contains every date between 1979 and 2050, or every number out to 1,000,000 or something. It looks dumb, but it helps make certain joins and queries performant.
The database table is called three_alpha_numerics. It has two columns: digit, which contains three characters, and is_numeric, which is a a single character: 'Y' or 'N'. It looks roughly like this:
Another representative line, and this one comes from an Excel spreadsheet. But, per Remy's Law of Requirements gathering ("No matter what the requirements doc says, what your users wanted was Excel"), this one was actually written by a developer. A developer who didn't understand how Excel works, but more important, didn't understand how dates worked either.
This comes from Ulysse J.
Today's anonymous submitter sends us two blocks. The first is a perfectly normal line of React code:
const [width, setWidth] = useState(false)
Frequent submitter Argle (previously), sends us a short little representative line. The good news is that this line of code came across Argle's screen during a code review: it was being removed. The bad news is that it was sitting in the code base for ages.
_ = len / 8.0f;
Today's anonymous submitter works for a large company. It's one of those sorts of companies which has piles, and piles, and piles of paperwork and bureaucracy. It also means that much of their portfolio of software is basic CRUD applications. "Here's a database for managing invoices." "Here's a database for managing desk assignments." "Here's a pile of databases which link our legacy applications to our new ERP system."
Which brings us to our representative line. It is not a representative line of code, but a representative line of the design specification. This is the design specification for yet another database-driven application.
Russell F (previously) sends us a small one today. It's not just a representative line, it's a representative comment. More than that, it's a true confession. Russell wrote some code, you see, and the logic was confusing. So, a co-worker added a comment to explain what the code was doing:
'This is *supposed* to fail. If it fails to fail, it throws a failure message
As previously discussed, C++ took a surprisingly long time to get a "starts with" function for strings. It took even longer to get a function called "contains". In part, that's simply because string::find solves that problem.
Nancy sends us a… different approach to solving this problem.
Today's anonymous submitter sends us some code that just makes your mind go… blank when you look at it.
public static boolean isNull(String value) {
return StringUtils.isBlank(value);
}
If you've seen one developer recounting how their AI agent deleted production, you've seen them all. They're mostly not interesting stories. It's like watching someone speeding through traffic on a motorcycle without a helmet: the eventual tragedy is sad, but it's unsurprising and not an interesting story to tell. It's not even interesting as a warning: the kind of person who speeds on a motorcycle without a helmet isn't doing so because they don't understand the danger. They've just decided it doesn't apply to them.
But the founder of PocketOS, Jer, recently shared how- whoopsie!- their AI agent deleted production. There's a lot of ingredients that go into this particular disaster, which I think makes it interesting, because the use of a poorly supervised AI agent is only one ingredient in this absolute trainwreck of a story.